Storage tanks, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing · California

Tiger Tanks, Inc.

Bakersfield, CA · ~25 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
19.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tiger Tanks, Inc. runs at 582% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Storage tanks, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Tiger Tanks, Inc.: 19.2 TCR = 582% of Storage tanks, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tiger Tanks, Inc. safety composite

Tiger Tanks, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 19.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−15.8

2017→2024

Tiger Tanks, Inc. injury rate improved

Tiger Tanks, Inc.'s TCR fell 15.8 from 24.6 in 2017 to 8.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 31.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=24.6 · 2018=26.2 · 2019=12.5 · 2021=4.7 · 2022=26.1 · 2023=31.4 · 2024=8.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332420 · Bakersfield, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 19.2 · 582% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #11/11
  • PHOTO Savannah Tank and Eq…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 31 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Savannah Tank and Equipment Corporation (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Tiger Tanks, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tiger Tanks, Inc. averages 19.2 TCR (582% of the Storage tanks, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tiger Tanks, Inc. TCR series: 2017=24.6 · 2018=26.2 · 2019=12.5 · 2021=4.7 · 2022=26.1 · 2023=31.4 · 2024=8.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Tiger Tanks, Inc. falls in its industry

355 Storage tanks, heavy gauge met establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 11 Storage tanks, heavy gauge met employers in California.

Tiger Tanks, Inc. (25 employees, TCR 19.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Tiger Tanks, Inc.
Tiger Tanks, Inc. (25 employees, TCR 19.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 3.6

Tiger Tanks, Inc. has fewer employees than the Storage tanks, heavy gauge metal, manufa median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.9 0.0 2 0 0
2023 31.4 7.8 8 0 0
2022 26.1 8.7 6 0 0
2021 4.7 4.7 1 0 0
2019 12.5 0.0 3 0 0
2018 26.2 0.0 6 0 0
2017 24.6 14.8 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332420 · CA · Bakersfield

355 Storage tanks, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 818 employers in Bakersfield, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Savannah Tank and Equipment Corporation 19.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wheeler Tank Manufacturing, Inc. 18.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Belli Corporation dba Westec Tank & Equipment 18.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Buckeye Fabricating Company 20.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Conservation Farms Ranches 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE GM Ag Services, Inc. 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Farm Shop 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dougherty Brothers 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA Bakersfield 4,667 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA-04 4,525 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - BFL1 4,113 FTE
CITY-NEAR Esparza Enterprises, Inc 3,267 FTE
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0615 Brick 19.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Northwest Health and Rehab, Inc. dba North Hills Life Care and Rehab 19.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 1 Bat1000 19.2 TCR
NAT-TCR K.B.P. Coil Coaters inc. 19.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Alamosa 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Walla Walla 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arizona Stucco and Synthetic Systems LLC 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE M-6 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.