Cellular phone tower construction · Wisconsin

Tilson Technology Management Appleton

Appleton, WI · ~21 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.7
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tilson Technology Management Appleton runs at 132% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Cellular phone tower construction workplace, earning a grade D.

Tilson Technology Management Appleton: 3.7 TCR = 132% of Cellular phone tower construction BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tilson Technology Management Appleton safety composite

Tilson Technology Management Appleton scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Tilson Technology Management Appleton: 0.0 → 3.2 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 6.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.87× in 2023

Tilson Technology Management Appleton's TCR rose 3.2 from 0.0 in 2020 to 3.2 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 6.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.87× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Appleton, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 3.7 · 132% of ind

  • DART 3.2 DART
  • RANK #22/40
  • PHOTO Farmers Electric Coo…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Farmers Electric Cooperative, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Tilson Technology Management Appleton in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tilson Technology Management Appleton averages 3.7 TCR (132% of the Cellular phone tower construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tilson Technology Management Appleton TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=6.8 · 2022=4.8 · 2023=3.2 · BLS 2.8

Where Tilson Technology Management Appleton falls in its industry

1,605 Cellular phone tower construct establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #22 safest of 40 Cellular phone tower construct employers in Wisconsin.

Tilson Technology Management Appleton (21 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Tilson Technology Management Appleton
Tilson Technology Management Appleton (21 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Tilson Technology Management Appleton has fewer employees than the Cellular phone tower construction median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.2 3.2 1 0 0
2022 4.8 0.0 1 0 0
2021 6.8 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · WI · Appleton

1,605 Cellular phone tower construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 356 employers in Appleton, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Farmers Electric Cooperative, Inc. 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1-NXU-Audubon 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR LEM Florida 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 434 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Legacy Farms LLC 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Westby 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Inguran LLC (dba STgenetics-Vienna Farms) 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE ALL ENERGY SOLAR MADISON WI 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR ThedaCare Regional Medical Center Appleton 1,649 FTE
CITY-NEAR ThedaCare Regional Medical Center-Appleton 1,563 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northern Operations 1,321 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fox Valley Technical College (WI) 1,279 FTE
NAT-TCR Polar Labs, Inc. 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Century Sign Builders 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Denton Brick Plant 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Seton Hall Pirate express C-Store 3.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Building 54 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tennessee Tractor Irrigation, LLC - Irrigation 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE McCoys Building Supply- Nacogdoches 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Salisbury Hatchery #2 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.