Cellular phone tower construction · Utah

Tilson Technology Management Inc. Salt Lake City, UT

South Salt Lake, UT · ~41 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tilson Technology Management Inc. Salt Lake City, UT runs at 64% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Cellular phone tower construction workplace, earning a grade B.

Tilson Technology Management Inc. Salt Lake City, UT: 1.8 TCR = 64% of Cellular phone tower construction BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tilson Technology Management Inc. Salt Lake City, UT safety composite

Tilson Technology Management Inc. Salt Lake City, UT scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Tilson Technology Management Inc. Salt Lake City, UT: 0.0 → 3.5 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 5.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2022

Tilson Technology Management Inc. Salt Lake City, UT's TCR rose 3.5 from 0.0 in 2017 to 3.5 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 5.5 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · South Salt Lake, UT AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.8 · 64% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #9/24
  • PHOTO California Commercia…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~41 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: California Commercial Solar, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Utah employers → · Look up another →

Tilson Technology Management Inc. Salt Lake City, UT in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tilson Technology Management Inc. Salt Lake City, UT averages 1.8 TCR (64% of the Cellular phone tower construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tilson Technology Management Inc. Salt Lake City, UT TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=5.5 · 2022=3.5 · BLS 2.8

Where Tilson Technology Management Inc. Salt Lake City, UT falls in its industry

1,605 Cellular phone tower construct establishments

Safer than 53% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Utah alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 24 Cellular phone tower construct employers in Utah.

Tilson Technology Management Inc. Salt Lake City, UT (41 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Tilson Technology Management Inc. Salt Lake City, UT
Tilson Technology Management Inc. Salt Lake City, UT (41 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Tilson Technology Management Inc. Salt Lake City, UT has fewer employees than the Cellular phone tower construction median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 3.5 0.0 1 0 0
2020 5.5 2.7 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · UT · South Salt Lake

1,605 Cellular phone tower construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,861 rated employers in Utah with headcount on file · 11 employers in South Salt Lake, UT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR California Commercial Solar, Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR S. King_Potelco 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Berry-It Inc 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brink Constructors, Inc. 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE BUD MAHAS CONSTRUCTION, INC. 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Black Rock Concrete 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harv & Higam Masonry 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harris & Hart, Inc. - Utah Shop 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR Men's Resource Center 198 FTE
CITY-NEAR L3Harris EDO Western Corporation 162 FTE
CITY-NEAR South Salt Lake #142 113 FTE
CITY-NEAR EWSUT 104 FTE
NAT-TCR Arkema Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 4388 Des Moines IA Sheet Plant 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 4044 Dayton Container 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 4179 Atlanta Sheet Plant 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE 041 Texas Health Specialty Hospital Fort Worth 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2158 Olive Branch Sheet Plant 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE St Louis Park Stilts Bldg 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE EMS - Columbus, IN 41 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.