Roofing contractors · Florida

Tim Graboski Roofing, Inc.

Deerfield Beach, FL · ~50 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.3
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tim Graboski Roofing, Inc. runs at 440% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Roofing contractors workplace, earning a grade F.

Tim Graboski Roofing, Inc.: 12.3 TCR = 440% of Roofing contractors BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tim Graboski Roofing, Inc. safety composite

Tim Graboski Roofing, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.3

2016→2023

Tim Graboski Roofing, Inc. injury rate improved

Tim Graboski Roofing, Inc.'s TCR fell 5.3 from 11.3 in 2016 to 6.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 421.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.49× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=11.3 · 2017=33.0 · 2018=16.5 · 2019=421.8 · 2020=8.2 · 2021=6.8 · 2022=4.5 · 2023=6.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238160 · Deerfield Beach, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.3 · 440% of ind

  • DART 6.0 DART
  • RANK #233/251
  • PHOTO PECK BROTHERS LIMITE…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 33 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PECK BROTHERS LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Tim Graboski Roofing, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tim Graboski Roofing, Inc. averages 12.3 TCR (440% of the Roofing contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tim Graboski Roofing, Inc. TCR series: 2016=11.3 · 2017=33 · 2018=16.5 · 2019=421.8 · 2020=8.2 · 2021=6.8 · 2022=4.5 · 2023=6 · BLS 2.8

Where Tim Graboski Roofing, Inc. falls in its industry

1,723 Roofing contractors establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #233 safest of 251 Roofing contractors employers in Florida.

Tim Graboski Roofing, Inc. (50 employees, TCR 12.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Tim Graboski Roofing, Inc.
Tim Graboski Roofing, Inc. (50 employees, TCR 12.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Tim Graboski Roofing, Inc. has more employees than the Roofing contractors median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 6.0 6.0 3 0 0
2022 4.5 4.5 2 0 0
2021 6.8 0.0 3 0 0
2020 8.2 8.2 4 0 0
2019 421.8 351.5 6 0 0
2018 16.5 16.5 3 0 0
2017 33.0 33.0 6 0 0
2016 11.3 9.4 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238160 · FL · Deerfield Beach

1,723 Roofing contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 119 employers in Deerfield Beach, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PECK BROTHERS LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY 12.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Weaver Metal & Roofing, Inc. 12.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jim Murray Roofing, Inc. 12.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR American Roofing 12.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bushnell 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cal-Maine foods Lake City 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE M & M Packing LLC 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Walton Service Center 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR Deerfield Beach 2,006 FTE
CITY-NEAR Program 014 - Broward 1,481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Deerfield Distribution 1,120 FTE
CITY-NEAR Campbell Property Management 914 FTE
NAT-TCR OrePac Building Products - Sacramento 12.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 1126 12.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Williamstown Commons Nursing & Rehab 12.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Starn Tool & Manufacturing Company 12.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE O&M Murfreesboro 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE L&S Electric, Inc. PCS Rothschild 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4418/3639 - Shell Rock Crossdocks 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE NERM - Delivery 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.