Manufacturer of Hardwood Plywood · Oregon

Timber Products - Medford Hardwoods

Medford, OR · ~226 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Timber Products - Medford Hardwoods runs at 205% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Manufacturer of Hardwood Plywood workplace, earning a grade F.

Timber Products - Medford Hardwoods: 6.8 TCR = 205% of Manufacturer of Hardwood Plywood BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Timber Products - Medford Hardwoods safety composite

Timber Products - Medford Hardwoods scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Timber Products - Medford Hardwoods: 5.3 → 7.7 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 10.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.02× in 2024

Timber Products - Medford Hardwoods's TCR rose 2.4 from 5.3 in 2016 to 7.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 10.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.02× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321211 · Medford, OR ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 6.8 · 205% of ind

  • DART 6.9 DART
  • RANK #5/7
  • PHOTO International Timber…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 83 inj
  • SIZE ~226 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: International Timber and Veneer, LC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Timber Products - Medford Hardwoods in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Timber Products - Medford Hardwoods averages 6.8 TCR (205% of the Manufacturer of Hardwood Plywood BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Timber Products - Medford Hardwoods TCR series: 2016=5.3 · 2018=7.5 · 2020=3.9 · 2021=10 · 2022=8 · 2023=4.9 · 2024=7.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Timber Products - Medford Hardwoods falls in its industry

116 Manufacturer of Hardwood Plywo establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 7 Manufacturer of Hardwood Plywo employers in Oregon.

Timber Products - Medford Hardwoods (226 employees, TCR 6.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 79 employees and a TCR of 5.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Timber Products - Medford Hardwoods
Timber Products - Medford Hardwoods (226 employees, TCR 6.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 79 employees and a TCR of 5.9

Timber Products - Medford Hardwoods has more employees than the Manufacturer of Hardwood Plywood median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.7 6.9 18 0 0
2023 4.9 4.9 11 0 0
2022 8.0 7.5 12 5 0
2021 10.0 9.6 7 17 0
2020 3.9 3.0 8 1 0
2018 7.5 6.6 17 0 0
2016 5.3 5.3 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321211 · OR · Medford

116 Manufacturer of Hardwood Plywood employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 250 employers in Medford, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR International Timber and Veneer, LC 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Carnes Frames Inc. - Brookwood Drive Location 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Architectural Forest Products LLC 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Global Engineering & Technology, Inc. 7.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Marquis Hot Tubs LLC 226 FTE
STATE-SIZE Warn Automotive LLC 226 FTE
STATE-SIZE Medline Renewal 226 FTE
STATE-SIZE 0345 - Washington Square 226 FTE
CITY-NEAR Harry and David Operations Inc 2,116 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR343 PROVIDENCE MEDFORD MEDICAL CENTER HR 1,136 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2252-00000590 1,130 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lithia Motors Support Services 677 FTE
NAT-TCR Carbondale Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Putnam County Emergency Medical Services 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 2559 - DeKalb 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR R11 Bennington VT 6.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Union Beer Distributors - Brooklyn 226 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2073 - Lincoln 226 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2730 - San Clemente 226 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chicago Postal CHIPS (LDS) 226 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.