Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Illinois

Timberlake Supportive Living

Springfield, IL · ~30 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Timberlake Supportive Living runs at 97% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Timberlake Supportive Living: 3.7 TCR = 97% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Timberlake Supportive Living safety composite

Timberlake Supportive Living scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Timberlake Supportive Living: 0.0 → 3.4 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 10.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.93× in 2024

Timberlake Supportive Living's TCR rose 3.4 from 0.0 in 2016 to 3.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 10.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.93× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Springfield, IL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.7 · 97% of ind

  • DART 3.4 DART
  • RANK #52/265
  • PHOTO Arden Courts of Silv…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Arden Courts of Silver Spring (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Timberlake Supportive Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Timberlake Supportive Living averages 3.7 TCR (97% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Timberlake Supportive Living TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=8.8 · 2019=0 · 2020=10.1 · 2021=0 · 2023=7.1 · 2024=3.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Timberlake Supportive Living falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #52 safest of 265 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Illinois.

Timberlake Supportive Living (30 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Timberlake Supportive Living
Timberlake Supportive Living (30 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Timberlake Supportive Living has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.4 3.4 1 0 0
2023 7.1 7.1 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 10.1 10.1 0 3 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 8.8 4.4 1 1 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · IL · Springfield

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 311 employers in Springfield, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Arden Courts of Silver Spring 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Primrose of Sedalia 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR RoseCrest 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heathwood Assisted Living at Penfield 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Odell Fire 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN ILLINOIS - Northern N - IL Common Ops 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chicago Loop Tech 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Spoon River Electric Cooperative, Inc. 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorial Medical Center 4,160 FTE
CITY-NEAR Springfield Memorial Hospital 3,837 FTE
CITY-NEAR Springfield Clinic, LLP 2,870 FTE
CITY-NEAR HSHS St. John's Hospital 2,696 FTE
NAT-TCR Legacy Express, LLC 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Costa Contracting, Inc. 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Abbott Tool, Inc. 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Certified Alloy Products Inc 3.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Blach Distributing Co. 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Golden Boy Pies Inc 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE KP Squared LLC 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sustanite Support Services, LLC 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.