Air courier services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · Illinois

Timestamp Logistics LLC

Chicago, IL · ~68 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Timestamp Logistics LLC runs at 18% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Air courier services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade A.

Timestamp Logistics LLC: 1.2 TCR = 18% of Air courier services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Timestamp Logistics LLC safety composite

Timestamp Logistics LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 98% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

83/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 98% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Timestamp Logistics LLC: 0.0 → 1.0 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 3.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.82× in 2024

Timestamp Logistics LLC's TCR rose 1.0 from 0.0 in 2020 to 1.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 3.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.82× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Chicago, IL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 18% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #7/249
  • PHOTO Primo Logistics LLC
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~68 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Primo Logistics LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Timestamp Logistics LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Timestamp Logistics LLC averages 1.2 TCR (18% of the Air courier services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Timestamp Logistics LLC TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2023=3.8 · 2024=1 · BLS 6.5

Where Timestamp Logistics LLC falls in its industry

6,679 Air courier services (except e establishments

Safer than 98% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 249 Air courier services (except e employers in Illinois.

Timestamp Logistics LLC (68 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Timestamp Logistics LLC
Timestamp Logistics LLC (68 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Timestamp Logistics LLC has fewer employees than the Air courier services (except establishme median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2023 3.8 3.8 3 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · IL · Chicago

6,679 Air courier services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 2,934 employers in Chicago, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Primo Logistics LLC 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR FedEx 480A E ROBINSON 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR LOGIXSTER LLC 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Fernlea Nurseries -MAG 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corteva STJ1 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2057-Centralia, IL 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE NG Rockford Service Center 68 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago Public Schools 49,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago/Corporate 18,831 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Illinois at Chicago 13,092 FTE
CITY-NEAR University Health Service UIC UIC Campus 12,732 FTE
NAT-TCR CNH Reman, LLC 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Abbeville 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Exchange Street 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Duff-Norton Charlotte 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Life Care Center of Seneca 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE 20948 - Three Rivers 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dirigo Pines 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bristol-Myers Squibb - Puerto Rico Guaynabo 68 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.