Base facilities operation support services · Oklahoma

Tinker AFB, Civil Engineering Services

Oklahoma City, OK · ~342 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tinker AFB, Civil Engineering Services runs at 106% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Base facilities operation support services workplace, earning a grade C.

Tinker AFB, Civil Engineering Services: 2.8 TCR = 106% of Base facilities operation support services BLS 2.6 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tinker AFB, Civil Engineering Services safety composite

Tinker AFB, Civil Engineering Services scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Tinker AFB, Civil Engineering Services: 1.3 → 2.0 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 5.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.6× in 2022

Tinker AFB, Civil Engineering Services's TCR rose 0.7 from 1.3 in 2016 to 2.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 5.4 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.6× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561210 · Oklahoma City, OK ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.8 · 106% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #8/15
  • PHOTO LOCKHEED MARTIN - OMI
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 64 inj
  • SIZE ~342 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LOCKHEED MARTIN - OMI (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oklahoma employers → · Look up another →

Tinker AFB, Civil Engineering Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tinker AFB, Civil Engineering Services averages 2.8 TCR (106% of the Base facilities operation support services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tinker AFB, Civil Engineering Services TCR series: 2016=1.3 · 2017=1.7 · 2018=3.3 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=2.2 · 2021=5.4 · 2022=2 · BLS 2.6

Where Tinker AFB, Civil Engineering Services falls in its industry

757 Base facilities operation supp establishments

Safer than 51% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oklahoma alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 15 Base facilities operation supp employers in Oklahoma.

Tinker AFB, Civil Engineering Services (342 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Tinker AFB, Civil Engineering Services
Tinker AFB, Civil Engineering Services (342 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Tinker AFB, Civil Engineering Services has more employees than the Base facilities operation support servic median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 2.0 1.6 6 0 0
2021 5.4 4.5 18 1 0
2020 2.2 1.4 8 0 0
2019 3.5 2.7 13 0 0
2018 3.3 2.5 12 0 0
2017 1.7 0.8 6 0 0
2016 1.3 1.3 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561210 · OK · Oklahoma City

757 Base facilities operation support services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,320 rated employers in Oklahoma with headcount on file · 1,293 employers in Oklahoma City, OK · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LOCKHEED MARTIN - OMI 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR NAVSEA SWRMC PCSI 810 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR TAMU PV Mn 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT NAZARETH EDUCATION SSF 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - DOK4 342 FTE
STATE-SIZE Enovation Controls 343 FTE
STATE-SIZE Evans Corporate 341 FTE
STATE-SIZE 992 341 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : OKC1 3,710 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - OKC1 3,462 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Anthony Hospital 3,417 FTE
CITY-NEAR OK005 3,027 FTE
NAT-TCR Shamrock Corporation 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Raleigh 48060 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR FTW Railhead 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Leetsdale Pa Depot 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Scottsdale Mfg 342 FTE
NAT-SIZE Goleta 342 FTE
NAT-SIZE Grandover Resort & Conference Center 342 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fire/Emergency Management 342 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.