General Medical and Surgical Hospitals · Tennessee

Tnnas16 Ascension Saint Thomas Rutherford

Murfreesboro, TN · ~1,984 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
6.1
Avg TCR
7.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tnnas16 Ascension Saint Thomas Rutherford runs at 81% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical General Medical and Surgical Hospitals workplace, earning a grade C.

Tnnas16 Ascension Saint Thomas Rutherford: 6.1 TCR = 81% of General Medical and Surgical Hospitals BLS 7.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tnnas16 Ascension Saint Thomas Rutherford safety composite

Tnnas16 Ascension Saint Thomas Rutherford scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Tnnas16 Ascension Saint Thomas Rutherford held a steady TCR band

Tnnas16 Ascension Saint Thomas Rutherford's TCR held near 0.3 from 6.0 in 2023 to 6.2 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.32× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=6.0 · 2024=6.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622110 · Murfreesboro, TN AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade C · TCR 6.1 · 81% of ind

  • DART 2.0 DART
  • RANK #107/157
  • PHOTO Piedmont Eastside Me…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 186 inj
  • SIZE ~1,984 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Piedmont Eastside Medical Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Tnnas16 Ascension Saint Thomas Rutherford in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tnnas16 Ascension Saint Thomas Rutherford averages 6.1 TCR (81% of the General Medical and Surgical Hospitals BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tnnas16 Ascension Saint Thomas Rutherford TCR series: 2023=6 · 2024=6.2 · BLS 7.5

Where Tnnas16 Ascension Saint Thomas Rutherford falls in its industry

6,862 General Medical and Surgical H establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #107 safest of 157 General Medical and Surgical H employers in Tennessee.

Tnnas16 Ascension Saint Thomas Rutherford (1,984 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Tnnas16 Ascension Saint Thomas Rutherford
Tnnas16 Ascension Saint Thomas Rutherford (1,984 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2

Tnnas16 Ascension Saint Thomas Rutherford has more employees than the General Medical and Surgical Hospitals median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.2 2.0 98 3 0
2023 6.0 1.7 88 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622110 · TN · Murfreesboro

6,862 General Medical and Surgical Hospitals employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 256 employers in Murfreesboro, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Piedmont Eastside Medical Center 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR ALLEN - Allen Hospital 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR NH-Oak Creek Community Hospital 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Coral Gables Hospital 6.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Goodlettsville Case Rdy Plant 1,994 FTE
STATE-SIZE POLICE 1,969 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nissan Americas Headquarters - Franklin 2,007 FTE
STATE-SIZE Williamson County Government 1,948 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Murfreesboro 2,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - BNA3 1,811 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : BNA3 1,708 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1855-TNNAS16 1,646 FTE
NAT-TCR 307 Providence 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Iljac - Jacksonville 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Kyvil - Outerloop Building 4 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR MK Magnetics, Inc. 6.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Duke Raleigh Hospital 1,984 FTE
NAT-SIZE 170 Data Drive Work Location-MAAV 1,985 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clara Maass Medical Center 1,985 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sysco 1,983 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.