Wood chipping in the field · Maine

TNT Road Company, Inc.

Fort Kent, ME · ~39 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.1
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

TNT Road Company, Inc. runs at 92% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Wood chipping in the field workplace, earning a grade C.

TNT Road Company, Inc.: 4.1 TCR = 92% of Wood chipping in the field BLS 4.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

TNT Road Company, Inc. safety composite

TNT Road Company, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.9

2016→2024

TNT Road Company, Inc. injury rate improved

TNT Road Company, Inc.'s TCR fell 8.9 from 8.9 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 10.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.9 · 2017=6.6 · 2018=1.8 · 2019=10.8 · 2020=4.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=2.2 · 2023=2.6 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 113310 · Fort Kent, ME AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.1 · 92% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/18
  • PHOTO CST Organic Recycling
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CST Organic Recycling (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maine employers → · Look up another →

TNT Road Company, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows TNT Road Company, Inc. averages 4.1 TCR (92% of the Wood chipping in the field BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

TNT Road Company, Inc. TCR series: 2016=8.9 · 2017=6.6 · 2018=1.8 · 2019=10.8 · 2020=4 · 2021=0 · 2022=2.2 · 2023=2.6 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.5

Where TNT Road Company, Inc. falls in its industry

177 Wood chipping in the field establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maine alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 18 Wood chipping in the field employers in Maine.

TNT Road Company, Inc. (39 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 37 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate TNT Road Company, Inc.
TNT Road Company, Inc. (39 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 37 employees and a TCR of 4.8

TNT Road Company, Inc. has more employees than the Wood chipping in the field median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2022 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 4.0 0.0 2 0 0
2019 10.8 1.8 6 0 0
2018 1.8 0.0 1 0 0
2017 6.6 1.6 4 0 0
2016 8.9 8.9 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

113310 · ME · Fort Kent

177 Wood chipping in the field employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,397 rated employers in Maine with headcount on file · 5 employers in Fort Kent, ME · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CST Organic Recycling 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Huffman and Wright logging 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR BEASLEY TIMBER COMPANY 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Manke Lumber Company Inc. - Shelton 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Auburn Manufacturing, Inc. MF 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Purestat Eng. 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1350,3270,8489 KAO 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE GILMAN ELECTRICAL SUPPLY (PC4997) 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR Irving Woodlands LLC 70 FTE
CITY-NEAR Daigle Oil Company - Corporate Office 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR SODEXO AT UMFK NOWLAND DINING HALL 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR Daigle Oil Company - 782 N Main St. Presque Isle 29 FTE
NAT-TCR GlobalRehab - Scottsdale, LLC (d/b/a HonorHealth Rehabilitation Hospital) 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Rockwell Community Nursing Home, Inc 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Concrete Service Co., Inc. 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Bliss Cancer Center/MGMC North Addition 4.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Heyboer & Bolt, Inc. 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Culbertson Restoration of New York 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aircraft 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store 211 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.