Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · Florida

Token Logistics DMO7

Orlando, FL · ~85 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
9.1
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Token Logistics DMO7 runs at 140% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade D.

Token Logistics DMO7: 9.1 TCR = 140% of Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Token Logistics DMO7 safety composite

Token Logistics DMO7 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 9.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Token Logistics DMO7: 8.9 → 9.3 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 9.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.02× in 2023

Token Logistics DMO7's TCR rose 0.4 from 8.9 in 2022 to 9.3 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 1.02× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Orlando, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 9.1 · 140% of ind

  • DART 9.3 DART
  • RANK #252/437
  • PHOTO FedEx 17170 WESTVIEW…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~85 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: FedEx 17170 WESTVIEW DRIVE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Token Logistics DMO7 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Token Logistics DMO7 averages 9.1 TCR (140% of the Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Token Logistics DMO7 TCR series: 2022=8.9 · 2023=9.3 · BLS 6.5

Where Token Logistics DMO7 falls in its industry

6,679 Courier services (i.e., interc establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #252 safest of 437 Courier services (i.e., interc employers in Florida.

Token Logistics DMO7 (85 employees, TCR 9.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Token Logistics DMO7
Token Logistics DMO7 (85 employees, TCR 9.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Token Logistics DMO7 has fewer employees than the Courier services (i.e., intercity networ median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 9.3 9.3 2 0 0
2022 8.9 8.9 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · FL · Orlando

6,679 Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,997 employers in Orlando, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR FedEx 17170 WESTVIEW DRIVE 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR FedEx 35 INTERNATIONAL DR 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR BRADLEY AIR FACILITY (CTBIA) 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR BAYTOWN CENTER (TXBAT) 9.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE SRQ 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE Labelle Citrus and Sod 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE SG HARVESTING LLC 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE Florida Energy Control Center 85 FTE
CITY-NEAR Universal Orlando Resort 20,343 FTE
CITY-NEAR Universal Parks and Resorts : UO 13,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR ADVENTHEALTH ORLANDO 11,412 FTE
CITY-NEAR Florida Hospital Orlando 10,318 FTE
NAT-TCR Residence inn Lake Union 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Fairport Baptist 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Lake Country Corporation 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Shaw's Wells Distribution Center 9.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Unit #2849 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE Parkway Products, LLC SEN 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE Unit #2802 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE Unit #2284 85 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.