Keyboards, computer peripheral equipment, manufacturing · California

Topaz Systems Inc

Moorpark, CA · ~26 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Topaz Systems Inc runs at 31% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Keyboards, computer peripheral equipment, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Topaz Systems Inc: 1.0 TCR = 31% of Keyboards, computer peripheral equipment, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Topaz Systems Inc safety composite

Topaz Systems Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 74% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.7

2018→2024

Topaz Systems Inc injury rate improved

Topaz Systems Inc's TCR fell 3.7 from 3.7 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 3.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=3.7 · 2019=3.4 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334118 · Moorpark, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 31% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/10
  • PHOTO Hope Industrial Syst…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hope Industrial Systems, Inc., Roswell, Georgia (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Topaz Systems Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Topaz Systems Inc averages 1.0 TCR (31% of the Keyboards, computer peripheral equipment, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Topaz Systems Inc TCR series: 2018=3.7 · 2019=3.4 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Topaz Systems Inc falls in its industry

48 Keyboards, computer peripheral establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 10 Keyboards, computer peripheral employers in California.

Topaz Systems Inc (26 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 95 employees and a TCR of 1.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Topaz Systems Inc
Topaz Systems Inc (26 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 95 employees and a TCR of 1.1

Topaz Systems Inc has fewer employees than the Keyboards, computer peripheral equipment median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.4 0.0 1 0 0
2018 3.7 3.7 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334118 · CA · Moorpark

48 Keyboards, computer peripheral equipment, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 54 employers in Moorpark, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hope Industrial Systems, Inc., Roswell, Georgia 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cortron, Inc. 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR AstroNova Inc. 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Toshiba Global Commerce Solutions Inc (TGCS) TriCenter 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE HAULING & TRAILER SHOP 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Seasholtz Co., LLC 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Redwood Valley Vineyards 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Central Coast Vineyards 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 578 2,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR PENTAIR WATER POOL & SPA INC. 623 FTE
CITY-NEAR MAJCO INC DBA BIG BRAND TIRE & SERVICE 310 FTE
CITY-NEAR Benchmark Electronics Moorpark 213 FTE
NAT-TCR Rochester Mustard St 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Morningside Church Productions 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Jacobs - Prescott Valley - OMI 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Chicago 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE At Home Stores #213 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE MOORESVILLE 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hawaii District Office 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE At Home Stores #192 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.