Lessors of self storage units · California

Total Storage Solutions

Anaheim, CA · ~142 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
4.8
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Total Storage Solutions runs at 345% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Lessors of self storage units workplace, earning a grade F.

Total Storage Solutions: 4.8 TCR = 345% of Lessors of self storage units BLS 1.4 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Total Storage Solutions safety composite

Total Storage Solutions scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.4

2017→2024

Total Storage Solutions injury rate improved

Total Storage Solutions's TCR fell 4.4 from 7.0 in 2017 to 2.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 8.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.18× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=7.0 · 2018=3.7 · 2019=8.6 · 2020=4.5 · 2021=6.1 · 2022=4.5 · 2023=1.7 · 2024=2.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 531130 · Anaheim, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 4.8 · 345% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #14/22
  • PHOTO CASTLE ROCK
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 35 inj
  • SIZE ~142 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CASTLE ROCK (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Total Storage Solutions in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Total Storage Solutions averages 4.8 TCR (345% of the Lessors of self storage units BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Total Storage Solutions TCR series: 2017=7 · 2018=3.7 · 2019=8.6 · 2020=4.5 · 2021=6.1 · 2022=4.5 · 2023=1.7 · 2024=2.6 · BLS 1.4

Where Total Storage Solutions falls in its industry

64 Lessors of self storage units establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 22 Lessors of self storage units employers in California.

Total Storage Solutions (142 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 110 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Total Storage Solutions
Total Storage Solutions (142 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 110 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Total Storage Solutions has more employees than the Lessors of self storage units median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.6 0.9 3 0 0
2023 1.7 0.8 2 0 0
2022 4.5 3.0 6 0 0
2021 6.1 4.3 6 1 0
2020 4.5 1.8 5 0 0
2019 8.6 3.4 4 6 0
2018 3.7 1.8 2 2 0
2017 7.0 5.0 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

531130 · CA · Anaheim

64 Lessors of self storage units employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 630 employers in Anaheim, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CASTLE ROCK 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Weston Investment Co LLC 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR GARDENA 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR PAYROLL DIRECT, INC 5.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Anatolio Munoz 142 FTE
STATE-SIZE Capay Farms 142 FTE
STATE-SIZE Firestorm Wildland Fire Suppression Inc. 142 FTE
STATE-SIZE SOLV, Inc 142 FTE
CITY-NEAR Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S. Inc., dba Disneyland Resort 38,057 FTE
CITY-NEAR Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc. d/b/a Disneyland Resort 28,066 FTE
CITY-NEAR Doubletree By Hilton Suites Anaheim 1,933 FTE
CITY-NEAR 08881053 ORANGE CO ANAHEIM MEDICAL CENTER 1,658 FTE
NAT-TCR Granger Machine, Inc. 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Minneapolis 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Golden Eagle Dist. Hannibal 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Anderson Hay & Grain Co., Inc. - Aurora, OR 4.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pepsi Cola Bottling-Conway 142 FTE
NAT-SIZE Landmark Snacks 142 FTE
NAT-SIZE GMN Tri-Co CAC, Inc. 142 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Oral Roberts University 142 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.