Youth centers (except recreational only) · Connecticut

Town of Waterford Youth Services

Waterford, CT · ~27 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Town of Waterford Youth Services runs at 100% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Youth centers (except recreational only) workplace, earning a grade C.

Town of Waterford Youth Services: 3.8 TCR = 100% of Youth centers (except recreational only) BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Town of Waterford Youth Services safety composite

Town of Waterford Youth Services scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Town of Waterford Youth Services: 0.0 → 9.9 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 12.8 TCR · DART/TCR 2.62× in 2022

Town of Waterford Youth Services's TCR rose 9.9 from 0.0 in 2017 to 9.9 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 12.8 TCR. In 2022, DART was 2.62× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624110 · Waterford, CT AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.8 · 100% of ind

  • DART 9.9 DART
  • RANK #4/10
  • PHOTO 327 - LaCrosse Youth
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 327 - LaCrosse Youth (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Town of Waterford Youth Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Town of Waterford Youth Services averages 3.8 TCR (100% of the Youth centers (except recreational only) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Town of Waterford Youth Services TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=12.8 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=9.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Town of Waterford Youth Services falls in its industry

328 Youth centers (except recreati establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 10 Youth centers (except recreati employers in Connecticut.

Town of Waterford Youth Services (27 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Town of Waterford Youth Services
Town of Waterford Youth Services (27 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Town of Waterford Youth Services has fewer employees than the Youth centers (except recreational only) median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 9.9 9.9 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 12.8 12.8 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624110 · CT · Waterford

328 Youth centers (except recreational only) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 81 employers in Waterford, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 327 - LaCrosse Youth 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR St. Johns Youth Academy 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR OLADET 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Family Mosaic Project 3.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bridgeport Harbor Station Unit 5 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Plainfield Renewable Energy 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE WORTH CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Zampell Refractories CT 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR MILLSTONE NUC 958 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2331 362 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2331 323 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bayview Health Care 229 FTE
NAT-TCR BUF-ODFL 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 9123-Dfw-Primeflight Aviation Services, Inc. 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR SuperMax Magnolia Gardens 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 677 - La Quinta 3.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ridge Crest Manor 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Skills of Central Pa Inc Corp 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dooge Veneers Inc. 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Neiman / Hoeller, Inc. dba: Neiman & Company, Inc. 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.