Mechanical rubber goods (i.e., extruded, lathe-cut, molded) manufacturing · Kentucky

Toyo Automotive Parts USA (INC)

Franklin, KY · ~215 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Toyo Automotive Parts USA (INC) runs at 99% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Mechanical rubber goods (i.e., extruded, lathe-cut, molded) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Toyo Automotive Parts USA (INC): 3.3 TCR = 99% of Mechanical rubber goods (i.e., extruded, lathe-cut, molded) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Toyo Automotive Parts USA (INC) safety composite

Toyo Automotive Parts USA (INC) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 56% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Toyo Automotive Parts USA (INC): 2.5 → 4.0 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 4.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.08× in 2023

Toyo Automotive Parts USA (INC)'s TCR rose 1.5 from 2.5 in 2022 to 4.0 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 1.08× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326291 · Franklin, KY AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.3 · 99% of ind

  • DART 3.5 DART
  • RANK #4/8
  • PHOTO Performance Elastome…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~215 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Performance Elastomers Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kentucky employers → · Look up another →

Toyo Automotive Parts USA (INC) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Toyo Automotive Parts USA (INC) averages 3.3 TCR (99% of the Mechanical rubber goods (i.e., extruded, lathe-cut, molded) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Toyo Automotive Parts USA (INC) TCR series: 2022=2.5 · 2023=4 · BLS 3.3

Where Toyo Automotive Parts USA (INC) falls in its industry

266 Mechanical rubber goods (i.e., establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kentucky alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 8 Mechanical rubber goods (i.e., employers in Kentucky.

Toyo Automotive Parts USA (INC) (215 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Toyo Automotive Parts USA (INC)
Toyo Automotive Parts USA (INC) (215 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 3.6

Toyo Automotive Parts USA (INC) has more employees than the Mechanical rubber goods (i.e., extruded, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 4.0 3.5 8 0 0
2022 2.5 2.5 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326291 · KY · Franklin

266 Mechanical rubber goods (i.e., extruded, lathe-cut, molded) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,805 rated employers in Kentucky with headcount on file · 62 employers in Franklin, KY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Performance Elastomers Corporation 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Watson-Marlow Flow Smart Inc. 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Qure Medical 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rubbercraft Corporation 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Nucor Tubular Products 215 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4016-18228003 215 FTE
STATE-SIZE 024-00717 215 FTE
STATE-SIZE 024-00707 215 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tractor Supply Company Distribution Center 0499 622 FTE
CITY-NEAR Franklin Precision Industry, Inc. 562 FTE
CITY-NEAR Berry Global Franklin KY 549 FTE
CITY-NEAR Berry Global Group 504 FTE
NAT-TCR Gaylord Sprins Golf Links 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Mount Materials LLC. 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Silgan Plastic Food Containers 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Superior Manufacturing 3.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE G Brothers Construction, Inc. 215 FTE
NAT-SIZE Grafton 215 FTE
NAT-SIZE Springs Window Fashions - Field Sales 215 FTE
NAT-SIZE Creative Alternatives, Inc. 215 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.