Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction · Arizona

Trac II, Inc.

Tucson, AZ · ~24 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Trac II, Inc. runs at 85% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction workplace, earning a grade C.

Trac II, Inc.: 2.4 TCR = 85% of Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Trac II, Inc. safety composite

Trac II, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Trac II, Inc. held a steady TCR band

Trac II, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 8.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=4.2 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=8.7 · 2020=4.3 · 2021=4.4 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · Tucson, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.4 · 85% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #17/36
  • PHOTO Maverick Underground…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Maverick Underground Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Trac II, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Trac II, Inc. averages 2.4 TCR (85% of the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Trac II, Inc. TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=4.2 · 2018=0 · 2019=8.7 · 2020=4.3 · 2021=4.4 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Trac II, Inc. falls in its industry

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 36 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat employers in Arizona.

Trac II, Inc. (24 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Trac II, Inc.
Trac II, Inc. (24 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Trac II, Inc. has fewer employees than the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), const median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 4.4 4.4 1 0 0
2020 4.3 4.3 1 0 0
2019 8.7 4.3 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 4.2 0.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · AZ · Tucson

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 1,150 employers in Tucson, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Maverick Underground Inc 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR First Utility District of Knox County 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR DiPonio Contracting LLC 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Glenbrook 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Rio Blanco, LLC - RBL332 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vasquez Brothers Inc. 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE NAES : OM - New Harquahala 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Arlington Valley Energy Facility 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Arizona 18,951 FTE
CITY-NEAR Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Airport Site 9,878 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tucson Medical Center 4,407 FTE
CITY-NEAR U.S. Border Patrol Sector - Tucson 3,989 FTE
NAT-TCR Arizona Beverages USA, LLC 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Colfax 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR David Clark Company Incorporated 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Columbia River Electric Maintenance 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE CRB Manufacturing Inc 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Huntsinger Farms, Inc. 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Greenway Equipment Russellville 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nucor Fastener 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.