Nitrogenous fertilizer materials manufacturing · Florida

TradeMark Nitrogen Tampa

Tampa, FL · ~32 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

TradeMark Nitrogen Tampa runs at 20% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Nitrogenous fertilizer materials manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

TradeMark Nitrogen Tampa: 0.7 TCR = 20% of Nitrogenous fertilizer materials manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

TradeMark Nitrogen Tampa safety composite

TradeMark Nitrogen Tampa scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TradeMark Nitrogen Tampa held a steady TCR band

TradeMark Nitrogen Tampa's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 3.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=2.9 · 2021=3.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325311 · Tampa, FL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 20% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/7
  • PHOTO Agrium U.S. Inc (Bor…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Agrium U.S. Inc (Borger Nitrogen Operations) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

TradeMark Nitrogen Tampa in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows TradeMark Nitrogen Tampa averages 0.7 TCR (20% of the Nitrogenous fertilizer materials manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

TradeMark Nitrogen Tampa TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=2.9 · 2021=3 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where TradeMark Nitrogen Tampa falls in its industry

85 Nitrogenous fertilizer materia establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 7 Nitrogenous fertilizer materia employers in Florida.

TradeMark Nitrogen Tampa (32 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate TradeMark Nitrogen Tampa
TradeMark Nitrogen Tampa (32 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 2.4

TradeMark Nitrogen Tampa has fewer employees than the Nitrogenous fertilizer materials manufac median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2020 2.9 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325311 · FL · Tampa

85 Nitrogenous fertilizer materials manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,659 employers in Tampa, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Agrium U.S. Inc (Borger Nitrogen Operations) 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nutrien 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nutrien Augusta Plant 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR CF Industries 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hunt Bros Service 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tamiami Citrus, LLC 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Osprey Energy Center 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Midulla Generating Station 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR Diversified Maintenance Systems LLC 10,600 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tampa General Hospital 7,849 FTE
CITY-NEAR Valet Living, LLC 6,337 FTE
CITY-NEAR ST. Joseph's Hospital (5100) 5,540 FTE
NAT-TCR Atlanta 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Kie-Con 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Goodway Graphics of MA., Inc 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Southern Region 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Teknor Apex Vermont Company 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Miller 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Adobe Walls Gin LP 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Transport Service 60104 Reynolds 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.