Grocery Store · Ohio

Trader Joe's 0669 Cincinnati

Cincinnati, OH · ~93 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.3
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Trader Joe's 0669 Cincinnati runs at 422% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Grocery Store workplace, earning a grade F.

Trader Joe's 0669 Cincinnati: 14.3 TCR = 422% of Grocery Store BLS 3.4 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Trader Joe's 0669 Cincinnati safety composite

Trader Joe's 0669 Cincinnati scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 68% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

38/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−14.4

2016→2024

Trader Joe's 0669 Cincinnati injury rate improved

Trader Joe's 0669 Cincinnati's TCR fell 14.4 from 19.3 in 2016 to 4.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 19.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.09× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=19.3 · 2017=18.4 · 2020=12.2 · 2021=15.8 · 2022=18.5 · 2023=11.3 · 2024=4.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 445110 · Cincinnati, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 14.3 · 422% of ind

  • DART 1.2 DART
  • RANK #736/748
  • PHOTO SWY-0019-0019-04405 …
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 37 inj
  • SIZE ~93 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SWY-0019-0019-04405 FAC-04405-HAZEL DELL-WA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Trader Joe's 0669 Cincinnati in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Trader Joe's 0669 Cincinnati averages 14.3 TCR (422% of the Grocery Store BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Trader Joe's 0669 Cincinnati TCR series: 2016=19.3 · 2017=18.4 · 2020=12.2 · 2021=15.8 · 2022=18.5 · 2023=11.3 · 2024=4.9 · BLS 3.4

Where Trader Joe's 0669 Cincinnati falls in its industry

30,654 Grocery Store establishments

Safer than 4% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #736 safest of 748 Grocery Store employers in Ohio.

Trader Joe's 0669 Cincinnati (93 employees, TCR 14.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Trader Joe's 0669 Cincinnati
Trader Joe's 0669 Cincinnati (93 employees, TCR 14.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Trader Joe's 0669 Cincinnati has fewer employees than the Grocery Store median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.9 1.2 4 0 0
2023 11.3 7.6 5 4 0
2022 18.5 17.0 4 9 0
2021 15.8 15.8 0 10 0
2020 12.2 9.1 4 4 0
2017 18.4 11.0 10 0 0
2016 19.3 17.4 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

445110 · OH · Cincinnati

30,654 Grocery Store employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 1,513 employers in Cincinnati, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SWY-0019-0019-04405 FAC-04405-HAZEL DELL-WA 14.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6400-SWY-0017-0017-00236 14.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR ROCHE BROS - WESTON 14.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4054-ABS-0020-0022-00218 14.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE 914-NiSource-Lorain OH-North Pointe Op Ctr 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jostin Construction, INC 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE Building Control Integrators, LLC 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE Columbus 93 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center 17,011 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Operations 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain : Evendale, OH 7,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain Evendale OH 6,400 FTE
NAT-TCR D1 Alsip Yard 14.3 TCR
NAT-TCR TXW001 14.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Ironwood State Prison 14.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Cambridge Health & Rehabilitation Center 14.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Trader Joe's 0749 Winston-Salem 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE Truck Country - Madison 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE TLC Services, Inc 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bill Joplin's Air Conditioning & Heating 93 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.