Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Massachusetts

Traditions of Wayland

Wayland, MA · ~67 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
24.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Traditions of Wayland runs at 634% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Traditions of Wayland: 24.1 TCR = 634% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Traditions of Wayland safety composite

Traditions of Wayland scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 4% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

2/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 24.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 20.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Traditions of Wayland: 18.6 → 42.7 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 47.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.83× in 2021

Traditions of Wayland's TCR rose 24.0 from 18.6 in 2016 to 42.7 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 47.2 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.83× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Wayland, MA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 24.1 · 634% of ind

  • DART 20.1 DART
  • RANK #204/210
  • PHOTO The Retreat at Summe…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 30 inj
  • SIZE ~67 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Retreat at Summerville (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Traditions of Wayland in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Traditions of Wayland averages 24.1 TCR (634% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Traditions of Wayland TCR series: 2016=18.6 · 2018=7.7 · 2019=4.2 · 2020=47.2 · 2021=42.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Traditions of Wayland falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #204 safest of 210 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Massachusetts.

Traditions of Wayland (67 employees, TCR 24.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Traditions of Wayland
Traditions of Wayland (67 employees, TCR 24.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Traditions of Wayland has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 42.7 20.1 8 9 0
2020 47.2 37.1 7 21 1
2019 4.2 0.0 2 0 0
2018 7.7 5.2 3 0 0
2016 18.6 14.9 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MA · Wayland

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 11 employers in Wayland, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Retreat at Summerville 24.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR A Heavenly Home Communities LLC 24.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Linden at Dedham 24.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR GranVida Senior Living and Memory Care 24.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Eversource - Hyde Park Electric 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eversource - Westborough 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE JS Rae - Berkshire 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kinetic Systems Inc. Scarborough Office 67 FTE
CITY-NEAR prime131 Grill 92 FTE
CITY-NEAR SUPER STOP & SHOP 2700 91 FTE
CITY-NEAR 102700 86 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2248-63181 65 FTE
NAT-TCR Generation Contracting and Emergency Services Inc 24.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Fort Gaines Health and Rehab 24.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Axios Logistics LLC 24.1 TCR
NAT-TCR The Taylor & Fenn Company 24.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cherryville Location 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE LGA-SAFS 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Park Place Assisted Living 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Critical Environments Inc 67 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.