Structural steel, fabricated, manufacturing · New Jersey

Transcontinental Contracting, Inc.

Piscataway, NJ · ~47 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Transcontinental Contracting, Inc. runs at 73% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Structural steel, fabricated, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Transcontinental Contracting, Inc.: 2.4 TCR = 73% of Structural steel, fabricated, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Transcontinental Contracting, Inc. safety composite

Transcontinental Contracting, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.8

2023→2024

Transcontinental Contracting, Inc. injury rate improved

Transcontinental Contracting, Inc.'s TCR fell 4.8 from 4.8 in 2023 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 4.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=4.8 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332312 · Piscataway, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 73% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/20
  • PHOTO ReSteel Supply Co., …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ReSteel Supply Co., Eddystone (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Transcontinental Contracting, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Transcontinental Contracting, Inc. averages 2.4 TCR (73% of the Structural steel, fabricated, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Transcontinental Contracting, Inc. TCR series: 2023=4.8 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Transcontinental Contracting, Inc. falls in its industry

1,491 Structural steel, fabricated, establishments

Safer than 74% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 20 Structural steel, fabricated, employers in New Jersey.

Transcontinental Contracting, Inc. (47 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Transcontinental Contracting, Inc.
Transcontinental Contracting, Inc. (47 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Transcontinental Contracting, Inc. has fewer employees than the Structural steel, fabricated, manufactur median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 4.8 1.6 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332312 · NJ · Piscataway

1,491 Structural steel, fabricated, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 124 employers in Piscataway, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ReSteel Supply Co., Eddystone 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR New Millennium Building Systems, LLC. - Butler 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR East Coast Metal Structures Corporation 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Topeka Foundry & Ironworks, Co. 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cape May Division 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mount Holly Municipal Utilities Authority 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE HC Constructors Inc. 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE D.A. Nolt, Inc. 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR Global Technology Center, Colgate - Palmolive 1,042 FTE
CITY-NEAR Colgate-Palmolive Global Technology Center 978 FTE
CITY-NEAR Colgate-Palmolive Company 978 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ferraro Foods 733 FTE
NAT-TCR Americold Logistics, LLC: Pendergrass 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR AHN Hempfield Neighborhood Hospital 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Medical Center 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Corporate Image Apparel 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Willmar Live Haul 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Us Autoforce Alsip 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Baptist Neighborhood Hospital Schertz 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE IS Acquisition, INC 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.