Flexible packaging, plastics film, manufacturing · Oklahoma

Transcontinental Packaging Tulsa

Catoosa, OK · ~86 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Transcontinental Packaging Tulsa runs at 41% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Flexible packaging, plastics film, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Transcontinental Packaging Tulsa: 1.4 TCR = 41% of Flexible packaging, plastics film, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Transcontinental Packaging Tulsa safety composite

Transcontinental Packaging Tulsa scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Transcontinental Packaging Tulsa: 0.0 → 1.0 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 3.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.74× in 2024

Transcontinental Packaging Tulsa's TCR rose 1.0 from 0.0 in 2022 to 1.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 3.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.74× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326112 · Catoosa, OK AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 41% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #5/6
  • PHOTO Mauser Packaging Sol…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~86 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mauser Packaging Solutions - Houston IBC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oklahoma employers → · Look up another →

Transcontinental Packaging Tulsa in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Transcontinental Packaging Tulsa averages 1.4 TCR (41% of the Flexible packaging, plastics film, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Transcontinental Packaging Tulsa TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=1 · BLS 3.3

Where Transcontinental Packaging Tulsa falls in its industry

396 Flexible packaging, plastics f establishments

Safer than 73% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oklahoma alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 6 Flexible packaging, plastics f employers in Oklahoma.

Transcontinental Packaging Tulsa (86 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 90 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Transcontinental Packaging Tulsa
Transcontinental Packaging Tulsa (86 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 90 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Transcontinental Packaging Tulsa has fewer employees than the Flexible packaging, plastics film, manuf median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2023 3.1 1.0 3 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326112 · OK · Catoosa

396 Flexible packaging, plastics film, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,320 rated employers in Oklahoma with headcount on file · 45 employers in Catoosa, OK · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mauser Packaging Solutions - Houston IBC 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amcor Flexibles 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Coveris Thomasville 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amcor Flexibles North America 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cactus Drilling Yards, HSE, Supers, Training 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE East Central Oklahoma Electric Cooperative 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE Frontier Bridge 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE NGC- Pryor Plant 86 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kelvion, Inc 542 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 3055 291 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3055 278 FTE
CITY-NEAR Village Travel Tulsa 181 FTE
NAT-TCR Altorfer Industries, Inc. - Rockford, IL - 5055 South Main Street 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR American Red Cross - 2825 Emerywood 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Stewart & Jasper Orchards 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Modern Ag Distribution Center 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE KCK Farms LLC 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hospice at Home of Arizona LLC 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Byram Somerset 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vadnais Trenchless Services, Inc. 86 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.