0 · Minnesota

Transport Solutions NA and EMEA : MFG-Minneapolis, MN-USA

Minneapolis, MN · ~583 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Transport Solutions NA and EMEA : MFG-Minneapolis, MN-USA runs at 31% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical 0 workplace, earning a grade A.

Transport Solutions NA and EMEA : MFG-Minneapolis, MN-USA: 1.0 TCR = 31% of 0 BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Transport Solutions NA and EMEA : MFG-Minneapolis, MN-USA safety composite

Transport Solutions NA and EMEA : MFG-Minneapolis, MN-USA scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Transport Solutions NA and EMEA : MFG-Minneapolis, MN-USA held a steady TCR band

Transport Solutions NA and EMEA : MFG-Minneapolis, MN-USA's TCR held near 0.1 from 1.1 in 2017 to 1.1 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 1.1 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.29× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.1 · 2018=0.9 · 2019=1.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333415 · Minneapolis, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 31% of ind

  • DART 0.3 DART
  • RANK #7/22
  • PHOTO Commercial HVAC Amer…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~583 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Commercial HVAC Americas : MFG-Rushville, IN-USA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Transport Solutions NA and EMEA : MFG-Minneapolis, MN-USA in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Transport Solutions NA and EMEA : MFG-Minneapolis, MN-USA averages 1.0 TCR (31% of the 0 BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Transport Solutions NA and EMEA : MFG-Minneapolis, MN-USA TCR series: 2017=1.1 · 2018=0.9 · 2019=1.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Transport Solutions NA and EMEA : MFG-Minneapolis, MN-USA falls in its industry

461 0 establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 22 0 employers in Minnesota.

Transport Solutions NA and EMEA : MFG-Minneapolis, MN-USA (583 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 164 employees and a TCR of 2.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Transport Solutions NA and EMEA : MFG-Minneapolis, MN-USA
Transport Solutions NA and EMEA : MFG-Minneapolis, MN-USA (583 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 164 employees and a TCR of 2.8

Transport Solutions NA and EMEA : MFG-Minneapolis, MN-USA has more employees than the 0 median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 1.1 0.3 7 0 0
2018 0.9 0.2 5 0 0
2017 1.1 0.2 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333415 · MN · Minneapolis

461 0 employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 1,321 employers in Minneapolis, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Commercial HVAC Americas : MFG-Rushville, IN-USA 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR East York 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Composite Cooling Solutions, L.P. 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR ATCO Rubber Products Plainville PV 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wenger Corp - OWA 582 FTE
STATE-SIZE ISD 199 582 FTE
STATE-SIZE Smithfield Foods 586 FTE
STATE-SIZE Benchmark Electronics Minnesota Division Rochester 586 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Minnesota Twin Cities 22,522 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN950 MN TELECOMMUTER 12,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0501 - City Center 8,459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hennepin County Medical Center 7,030 FTE
NAT-TCR Oneida Total Integrated Enterprises, LLC 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Memphis - 056 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR US OH Massillon Plant 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR US IL Matteson Plant 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Company Wide 583 FTE
NAT-SIZE Northboro (Ma33) 583 FTE
NAT-SIZE OSRAM Hillsboro 583 FTE
NAT-SIZE General Mills (Belvidere) 583 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.