Landscape care and maintenance services · Minnesota

Tree Trust St. Louis Park

St Louis Park, MN · ~77 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.4
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tree Trust St. Louis Park runs at 252% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Landscape care and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade F.

Tree Trust St. Louis Park: 11.4 TCR = 252% of Landscape care and maintenance services BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tree Trust St. Louis Park safety composite

Tree Trust St. Louis Park scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−17.9

2017→2019

Tree Trust St. Louis Park injury rate improved

Tree Trust St. Louis Park's TCR fell 17.9 from 17.9 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 17.9 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=17.9 · 2018=16.1 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561730 · St Louis Park, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.4 · 252% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #56/64
  • PHOTO Impact Landscaping &…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~77 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Impact Landscaping & Irrigation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Tree Trust St. Louis Park in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tree Trust St. Louis Park averages 11.4 TCR (252% of the Landscape care and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tree Trust St. Louis Park TCR series: 2017=17.9 · 2018=16.1 · 2019=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Tree Trust St. Louis Park falls in its industry

2,875 Landscape care and maintenance establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #56 safest of 64 Landscape care and maintenance employers in Minnesota.

Tree Trust St. Louis Park (77 employees, TCR 11.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Tree Trust St. Louis Park
Tree Trust St. Louis Park (77 employees, TCR 11.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Tree Trust St. Louis Park has more employees than the Landscape care and maintenance services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 16.1 4.0 7 1 0
2017 17.9 8.2 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561730 · MN · St Louis Park

2,875 Landscape care and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 57 employers in St Louis Park, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Impact Landscaping & Irrigation 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 5033 - York 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hillermann Nursery & Florist, Inc. 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Becker Landscape 11.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE St Cloud Service Center-LB 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE Regional Maintenance Facility- Interceptor Services 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shaw-Lundquist Associates, Inc. Eagan office 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE Linco Fab, Inc 77 FTE
CITY-NEAR PNMH ST LOUIS PARK METHODIST HOSP 2,916 FTE
CITY-NEAR PN1N ST LOUIS PARK 3800 BLDG 670 FTE
CITY-NEAR city of st. louis park 510 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northland Aluminum Products, Inc 444 FTE
NAT-TCR Reno PDC 11.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Biazzo 11.4 TCR
NAT-TCR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : OAK3 11.4 TCR
NAT-TCR SD,ABERDEEN - Medical Center Campus - General Medical and Surgical Hospitals 11.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE STAT Medical Transport 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2500 Delta EGV IL 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE Felton Incorporated 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pacific Gardens Alzheimer's Special Care Center 77 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.