Airport baggage handling services · New York

Trego/Dugan Aviation, Inc Syr

Syracuse, NY · ~30 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.4
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Trego/Dugan Aviation, Inc Syr runs at 253% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Airport baggage handling services workplace, earning a grade F.

Trego/Dugan Aviation, Inc Syr: 11.4 TCR = 253% of Airport baggage handling services BLS 4.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Trego/Dugan Aviation, Inc Syr safety composite

Trego/Dugan Aviation, Inc Syr scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

21/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.1

2018→2023

Trego/Dugan Aviation, Inc Syr injury rate improved

Trego/Dugan Aviation, Inc Syr's TCR fell 7.1 from 17.1 in 2018 to 10.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 18.6 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.88× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=17.1 · 2019=12.4 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=10.2 · 2022=18.6 · 2023=10.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488119 · Syracuse, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.4 · 253% of ind

  • DART 10.0 DART
  • RANK #106/111
  • PHOTO Remote Sorting Facil…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Remote Sorting Faciltiy (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Trego/Dugan Aviation, Inc Syr in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Trego/Dugan Aviation, Inc Syr averages 11.4 TCR (253% of the Airport baggage handling services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Trego/Dugan Aviation, Inc Syr TCR series: 2018=17.1 · 2019=12.4 · 2020=0 · 2021=10.2 · 2022=18.6 · 2023=10 · BLS 4.5

Where Trego/Dugan Aviation, Inc Syr falls in its industry

1,555 Airport baggage handling servi establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #106 safest of 111 Airport baggage handling servi employers in New York.

Trego/Dugan Aviation, Inc Syr (30 employees, TCR 11.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Trego/Dugan Aviation, Inc Syr
Trego/Dugan Aviation, Inc Syr (30 employees, TCR 11.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Trego/Dugan Aviation, Inc Syr has fewer employees than the Airport baggage handling services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 10.0 10.0 3 0 0
2022 18.6 18.6 4 0 0
2021 10.2 10.2 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 12.4 0.0 2 0 0
2018 17.1 8.6 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488119 · NY · Syracuse

1,555 Airport baggage handling services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 436 employers in Syracuse, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Remote Sorting Faciltiy 11.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6957-RIC 11.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR LAX086 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR GAT - MOMCI 11.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hemdale Farms Inc 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE My Forest Foods 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Part 2 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE W.W. Patterson, Inc. 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Joseph's Health 4,299 FTE
CITY-NEAR SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY 3,970 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Joseph's Hospital Health Center 3,720 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Joseph's Hospital Health Center-SJH-NY 2,803 FTE
NAT-TCR 5073 - WA Pierce County Detention 11.4 TCR
NAT-TCR On Stage Waikiki - Rock-A-Hula 11.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 0737 11.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Western Trailer Sales Co. Inc. 11.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cleveland Vibrator Company 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Northern Indiana Manufacturing 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Land of Lincoln Goodwill Champaign Store 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Straight Arrow Products, Inc. - Highland 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.