Coaxial mechanical face seals manufacturing · New Hampshire

Trelleborg Pipe Seals Milford, Inc. - Elm Street

Milford, NH · ~27 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Trelleborg Pipe Seals Milford, Inc. - Elm Street runs at 65% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Coaxial mechanical face seals manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Trelleborg Pipe Seals Milford, Inc. - Elm Street: 2.1 TCR = 65% of Coaxial mechanical face seals manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Trelleborg Pipe Seals Milford, Inc. - Elm Street safety composite

Trelleborg Pipe Seals Milford, Inc. - Elm Street scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.3

2020→2022

Trelleborg Pipe Seals Milford, Inc. - Elm Street injury rate improved

Trelleborg Pipe Seals Milford, Inc. - Elm Street's TCR fell 4.3 from 4.3 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 4.3 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=4.3 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339991 · Milford, NH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 65% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/8
  • PHOTO Alkegen Fulton
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Alkegen Fulton (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Hampshire employers → · Look up another →

Trelleborg Pipe Seals Milford, Inc. - Elm Street in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Trelleborg Pipe Seals Milford, Inc. - Elm Street averages 2.1 TCR (65% of the Coaxial mechanical face seals manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Trelleborg Pipe Seals Milford, Inc. - Elm Street TCR series: 2020=4.3 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Trelleborg Pipe Seals Milford, Inc. - Elm Street falls in its industry

218 Coaxial mechanical face seals establishments

Safer than 53% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Hampshire alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 8 Coaxial mechanical face seals employers in New Hampshire.

Trelleborg Pipe Seals Milford, Inc. - Elm Street (27 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 84 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Trelleborg Pipe Seals Milford, Inc. - Elm Street
Trelleborg Pipe Seals Milford, Inc. - Elm Street (27 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 84 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Trelleborg Pipe Seals Milford, Inc. - Elm Street has fewer employees than the Coaxial mechanical face seals manufactur median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 4.3 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339991 · NH · Milford

218 Coaxial mechanical face seals manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,718 rated employers in New Hampshire with headcount on file · 51 employers in Milford, NH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Alkegen Fulton 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Freudenberg NOK Sealing Technologies 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR SKF USA Inc. - Salt Lake City 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Johnson Bros. - West Salem, Inc. 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Company 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Adam Vaillancourt Roofing 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE CCG:CG020 - CG020-Epping, NH 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Martineau Electric, Inc. 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alene Candles LLC 413 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gas Turbine Operations 384 FTE
CITY-NEAR CounterGravity Vacuum Cast Operation (VCO) 335 FTE
CITY-NEAR Market Basket #57 274 FTE
NAT-TCR Foley, Incorporated 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Main 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Texas Fifth Wall Roofing Systems 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Kansas Golf and Turf, inc 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Neiman / Hoeller, Inc. dba: Neiman & Company, Inc. 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE PSSI - 0022 Cargill Incorporated - Hazleton 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dooge Veneers Inc. 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Skills of Central Pa Inc Corp 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.