Communications equipment, mobile and microwave, manufacturing · California

TrellisWare Technologies, Inc.

San Diego, CA · ~234 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

TrellisWare Technologies, Inc. runs at 2% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Communications equipment, mobile and microwave, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

TrellisWare Technologies, Inc.: 0.1 TCR = 2% of Communications equipment, mobile and microwave, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

TrellisWare Technologies, Inc. safety composite

TrellisWare Technologies, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 98% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 98% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TrellisWare Technologies, Inc. held a steady TCR band

TrellisWare Technologies, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 0.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.4 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334220 · San Diego, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.1 · 2% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/43
  • PHOTO CO20
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~234 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CO20 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

TrellisWare Technologies, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows TrellisWare Technologies, Inc. averages 0.1 TCR (2% of the Communications equipment, mobile and microwave, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

TrellisWare Technologies, Inc. TCR series: 2019=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0.4 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where TrellisWare Technologies, Inc. falls in its industry

247 Communications equipment, mobi establishments

Safer than 98% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 43 Communications equipment, mobi employers in California.

TrellisWare Technologies, Inc. (234 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 115 employees and a TCR of 1.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate TrellisWare Technologies, Inc.
TrellisWare Technologies, Inc. (234 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 115 employees and a TCR of 1.1

TrellisWare Technologies, Inc. has more employees than the Communications equipment, mobile and mic median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.4 0.4 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334220 · CA · San Diego

247 Communications equipment, mobile and microwave, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,979 employers in San Diego, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CO20 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Viasat - Denver 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR TX140 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Massari 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Edlyn Jauregui DBA Valdeja Ag. 234 FTE
STATE-SIZE Main Office 234 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alameda County Water District 234 FTE
STATE-SIZE Desert Cities Region 234 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Diego Health 9,310 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Atomics 8,108 FTE
CITY-NEAR Health Human Services Agency 6,080 FTE
CITY-NEAR National University 4,955 FTE
NAT-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation US CO Highlands Ranch-Lucent Twrs (5535) 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Decatur Reynolds Office 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Hillsborough Service Center 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Performance Contractors, Inc. - Exxon-Beaumont 0.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE L.C. Whitford Co., Inc. 234 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lucky 7 Logistics 234 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sparc 234 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cherry Valley Il - 3042 234 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.