Highway, Street, and Bridge Construction · Pennsylvania

Tresco Paving Corporation

Pittsburgh, PA · ~77 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.8
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tresco Paving Corporation runs at 173% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Highway, Street, and Bridge Construction workplace, earning a grade D.

Tresco Paving Corporation: 4.8 TCR = 173% of Highway, Street, and Bridge Construction BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tresco Paving Corporation safety composite

Tresco Paving Corporation scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.6

2016→2024

Tresco Paving Corporation injury rate improved

Tresco Paving Corporation's TCR fell 4.6 from 10.0 in 2016 to 5.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 10.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.9× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=10.0 · 2018=7.2 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=1.7 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=5.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · Pittsburgh, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.8 · 173% of ind

  • DART 4.4 DART
  • RANK #133/196
  • PHOTO Ashland AHQ
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~77 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ashland AHQ (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Tresco Paving Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tresco Paving Corporation averages 4.8 TCR (173% of the Highway, Street, and Bridge Construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tresco Paving Corporation TCR series: 2016=10 · 2018=7.2 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=1.7 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=5.5 · BLS 2.8

Where Tresco Paving Corporation falls in its industry

4,078 Highway, Street, and Bridge Co establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #133 safest of 196 Highway, Street, and Bridge Co employers in Pennsylvania.

Tresco Paving Corporation (77 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Tresco Paving Corporation
Tresco Paving Corporation (77 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Tresco Paving Corporation has more employees than the Highway, Street, and Bridge Construction median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.5 4.4 5 0 0
2023 1.4 1.4 2 0 0
2020 1.7 0.0 0 1 0
2019 3.1 3.1 2 0 0
2018 7.2 5.4 4 0 0
2016 10.0 8.0 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · PA · Pittsburgh

4,078 Highway, Street, and Bridge Construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 1,170 employers in Pittsburgh, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ashland AHQ 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bush Engineering, Inc. 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Shamrock Traffic 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lanford Brothers Company Inc. 4.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Middletown Egg 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE UGI Lancaster 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE Transwall Office Systems 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE Reynolds Enterprises, Inc. - Reynolds Construction, LLC (Harrisburg) 77 FTE
CITY-NEAR United States Steel COrporation 15,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh- Oakland 14,135 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside (PUH) 13,900 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh-Oakland 13,208 FTE
NAT-TCR Pacha Soap Co 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Vistapak Industries, Inc 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR The Retreat at Easley 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Capitol Coastal N Charleston 4.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Gaylord Industries 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE Otis Elevator Company-Buffalo 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amtech Elevator Company-Glendale 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE J.W. Bamford, Inc. 77 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.