General freight trucking, local · Arkansas

Tri-State Iron and Metal Company Logistics

Texarkana, AR · ~38 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.4
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tri-State Iron and Metal Company Logistics runs at 97% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical General freight trucking, local workplace, earning a grade C.

Tri-State Iron and Metal Company Logistics: 4.4 TCR = 97% of General freight trucking, local BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tri-State Iron and Metal Company Logistics safety composite

Tri-State Iron and Metal Company Logistics scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.7

2023→2024

Tri-State Iron and Metal Company Logistics injury rate improved

Tri-State Iron and Metal Company Logistics's TCR fell 1.7 from 5.3 in 2023 to 3.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 5.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.8× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=5.3 · 2024=3.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484110 · Texarkana, AR AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.4 · 97% of ind

  • DART 3.5 DART
  • RANK #12/16
  • PHOTO DGA Services Inc, db…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DGA Services Inc, dba JIT Transportation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arkansas employers → · Look up another →

Tri-State Iron and Metal Company Logistics in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tri-State Iron and Metal Company Logistics averages 4.4 TCR (97% of the General freight trucking, local BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tri-State Iron and Metal Company Logistics TCR series: 2023=5.3 · 2024=3.5 · BLS 4.5

Where Tri-State Iron and Metal Company Logistics falls in its industry

2,784 General freight trucking, loca establishments

Safer than 53% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arkansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 16 General freight trucking, loca employers in Arkansas.

Tri-State Iron and Metal Company Logistics (38 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Tri-State Iron and Metal Company Logistics
Tri-State Iron and Metal Company Logistics (38 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Tri-State Iron and Metal Company Logistics has fewer employees than the General freight trucking, local median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.5 3.5 1 0 0
2023 5.3 5.3 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484110 · AR · Texarkana

2,784 General freight trucking, local employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,393 rated employers in Arkansas with headcount on file · 44 employers in Texarkana, AR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DGA Services Inc, dba JIT Transportation 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sheehy Mail Contractors 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pitt Ohio - Columbus 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Starfleet Logistics LLC 4.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Thompson Construction Group Inc Nucor JMS 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alliance Utilities Inc 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Systems Plant Services, Inc.-BLY02 Hickman AR 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Evergreen Industrial Services - El Dorado 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cooper Tire & Rubber Texarkana Plant 1,744 FTE
CITY-NEAR Southern Refrigerated Transport 847 FTE
CITY-NEAR 468 361 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 468 327 FTE
NAT-TCR Vinyl Kraft Acquisition 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Mipon - Pontiac 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Ft Gratiot 10170 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Ideal Consolidated, Inc. 4.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE National Distribution Centers LLC-2901 CHANNAHON RD 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Premier Contracting, Inc. 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Monroe 1 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Scanivalve Corp 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.