Display cases and fixtures (except refrigerated) manufacturing · Missouri

Triad Manufacturing, Inc.

St. Louis, MO · ~407 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Triad Manufacturing, Inc. runs at 79% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Display cases and fixtures (except refrigerated) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Triad Manufacturing, Inc.: 2.6 TCR = 79% of Display cases and fixtures (except refrigerated) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Triad Manufacturing, Inc. safety composite

Triad Manufacturing, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.5

2017→2024

Triad Manufacturing, Inc. injury rate improved

Triad Manufacturing, Inc.'s TCR fell 1.5 from 3.5 in 2017 to 2.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.49× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.5 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=3.2 · 2022=2.9 · 2023=1.7 · 2024=2.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 337215 · St. Louis, MO AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.6 · 79% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #2/12
  • PHOTO Casual Aluminum LLC
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 70 inj
  • SIZE ~407 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Casual Aluminum LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Triad Manufacturing, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Triad Manufacturing, Inc. averages 2.6 TCR (79% of the Display cases and fixtures (except refrigerated) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Triad Manufacturing, Inc. TCR series: 2017=3.5 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=3.2 · 2022=2.9 · 2023=1.7 · 2024=2 · BLS 3.3

Where Triad Manufacturing, Inc. falls in its industry

231 Display cases and fixtures (ex establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 12 Display cases and fixtures (ex employers in Missouri.

Triad Manufacturing, Inc. (407 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Triad Manufacturing, Inc.
Triad Manufacturing, Inc. (407 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Triad Manufacturing, Inc. has more employees than the Display cases and fixtures (except refri median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.0 1.3 8 0 0
2023 1.7 1.2 5 2 0
2022 2.9 1.5 13 1 0
2020 3.2 1.6 11 1 0
2019 2.5 1.5 8 2 0
2018 2.5 2.1 11 0 0
2017 3.5 1.6 14 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

337215 · MO · St. Louis

231 Display cases and fixtures (except refrigerated) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 686 employers in St. Louis, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Casual Aluminum LLC 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Interlake Mecalux 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR InStore Design Display 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Process Displays, LLC - Solid 4 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Smithfield, Martin City Packaged 407 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 1177 407 FTE
STATE-SIZE Reinhold Electric, Inc. 408 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 29 408 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monsanto - St. Louis 6,028 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Anthony's Medical Center 3,706 FTE
CITY-NEAR ABI Corporation 2,720 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Louis University Hospital 2,084 FTE
NAT-TCR 3614 - EAN Holdings, LLC Hawaii Division 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Hydro Honing Laboratories 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Indiana University Health White Memorial Hospital, Inc. 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Beaumont 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Walter P Reuther - Dhhs 407 FTE
NAT-SIZE Block 22 LLC 407 FTE
NAT-SIZE PACCAR Inc - Corporate 407 FTE
NAT-SIZE New England Wire Technologies Corporation 407 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.