Industrial building (except warehouses) construction · Alabama

Tridelta Systems, Abbeville, AL

Abbeville, AL · ~96 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tridelta Systems, Abbeville, AL runs at 73% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Industrial building (except warehouses) construction workplace, earning a grade B.

Tridelta Systems, Abbeville, AL: 2.1 TCR = 73% of Industrial building (except warehouses) construction BLS 2.9 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tridelta Systems, Abbeville, AL safety composite

Tridelta Systems, Abbeville, AL scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

38/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Tridelta Systems, Abbeville, AL: 2.0 → 2.4 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 2.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.16× in 2020

Tridelta Systems, Abbeville, AL's TCR rose 0.4 from 2.0 in 2018 to 2.4 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 1.16× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236210 · Abbeville, AL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 73% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #27/33
  • PHOTO Tunista Construction…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~96 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Tunista Construction - Washington office (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Tridelta Systems, Abbeville, AL in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tridelta Systems, Abbeville, AL averages 2.1 TCR (73% of the Industrial building (except warehouses) construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tridelta Systems, Abbeville, AL TCR series: 2018=2 · 2019=1.9 · 2020=2.4 · BLS 2.9

Where Tridelta Systems, Abbeville, AL falls in its industry

924 Industrial building (except wa establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #27 safest of 33 Industrial building (except wa employers in Alabama.

Tridelta Systems, Abbeville, AL (96 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Tridelta Systems, Abbeville, AL
Tridelta Systems, Abbeville, AL (96 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Tridelta Systems, Abbeville, AL has more employees than the Industrial building (except warehouses) median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 2.4 2.4 3 0 0
2019 1.9 1.9 2 0 0
2018 2.0 2.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236210 · AL · Abbeville

924 Industrial building (except warehouses) construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 17 employers in Abbeville, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Tunista Construction - Washington office 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cold Storage Construction Services 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sullivan and Merritt Constructors 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Deacon Construction, LLC - OR 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Parkes Mechanical & Metals, Inc 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE Evergreen Siteworks LLC 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE Liberty Steel Fabrication 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE Futaba Corporation of America 96 FTE
CITY-NEAR Henry County Health & Rehabilitation Facility 191 FTE
CITY-NEAR Great Southern Wood - Corporate 153 FTE
CITY-NEAR Henry County Health and Rehab 147 FTE
CITY-NEAR Abbeville Fiber, LLC 91 FTE
NAT-TCR Meijer Store 131 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Lebanon Hauling 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR U-City Forest Manor, LLC 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Covenant Place of Waxahachie 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Potato Pack Plant 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mauser USA Mt Vernon IBC 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kings Nursing & Rehabilitation Hospital, Inc. 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE Universal Forest Products plant 380 96 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.