Roof trusses, wood, manufacturing · Texas

Trimco Building Components

El Paso, TX · ~23 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Trimco Building Components runs at 115% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Roof trusses, wood, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Trimco Building Components: 3.8 TCR = 115% of Roof trusses, wood, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Trimco Building Components safety composite

Trimco Building Components scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.1

2017→2024

Trimco Building Components injury rate improved

Trimco Building Components's TCR fell 10.1 from 10.1 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 15.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=10.1 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=5.1 · 2020=15.2 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321214 · El Paso, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.8 · 115% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #16/39
  • PHOTO Fontana wood product…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fontana wood products of California (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Trimco Building Components in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Trimco Building Components averages 3.8 TCR (115% of the Roof trusses, wood, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Trimco Building Components TCR series: 2017=10.1 · 2018=0 · 2019=5.1 · 2020=15.2 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Trimco Building Components falls in its industry

421 Roof trusses, wood, manufactur establishments

Safer than 76% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 39 Roof trusses, wood, manufactur employers in Texas.

Trimco Building Components (23 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 7.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Trimco Building Components
Trimco Building Components (23 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 7.0

Trimco Building Components has fewer employees than the Roof trusses, wood, manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 15.2 0.0 3 0 0
2019 5.1 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 10.1 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321214 · TX · El Paso

421 Roof trusses, wood, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 974 employers in El Paso, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fontana wood products of California 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stark Truss Co., Inc. Edgerton, OH 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Savannah GA Truss 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR TS 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Houston South Mill Distribution, LLC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Smallhold, Buda 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMARILLO SOD FARM 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE VISITORS MANAGEMENT 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR U.S. Border Patrol Sector - El Paso 2,330 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alegre Home Health Care, LLC EL PASO 1,942 FTE
CITY-NEAR Office of Field Operations - El Paso 1,847 FTE
CITY-NEAR MVT Services, LLC 1,798 FTE
NAT-TCR Port Jeff 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Almega Tru-Flex, Inc. 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Heritage Hall Laurel Meadows 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Feed Delivery - Warsaw -Est 3.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rolled Metal Products-Northeast 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Propak - Oklahoma City, OK RLC 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ft Pierce 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Expediting Co., Inc. CMH 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.