Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) · Oregon

TriMet Elmonica Operations Facility

Beaverton, OR · ~192 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.5
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

TriMet Elmonica Operations Facility runs at 167% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) workplace, earning a grade D.

TriMet Elmonica Operations Facility: 7.5 TCR = 167% of Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

TriMet Elmonica Operations Facility safety composite

TriMet Elmonica Operations Facility scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 62% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2016→2018

TriMet Elmonica Operations Facility injury rate improved

TriMet Elmonica Operations Facility's TCR fell 0.4 from 5.8 in 2016 to 5.4 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 11.2 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.8 · 2017=11.2 · 2018=5.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 485111 · Beaverton, OR ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 7.5 · 167% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #14/30
  • PHOTO 1122 77TH STREET MAI…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 43 inj
  • SIZE ~192 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 1122 77TH STREET MAINTENANCE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

TriMet Elmonica Operations Facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows TriMet Elmonica Operations Facility averages 7.5 TCR (167% of the Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

TriMet Elmonica Operations Facility TCR series: 2016=5.8 · 2017=11.2 · 2018=5.4 · BLS 4.5

Where TriMet Elmonica Operations Facility falls in its industry

421 Mixed mode transit systems (e. establishments

Safer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 30 Mixed mode transit systems (e. employers in Oregon.

TriMet Elmonica Operations Facility (192 employees, TCR 7.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 217 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate TriMet Elmonica Operations Facility
TriMet Elmonica Operations Facility (192 employees, TCR 7.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 217 employees and a TCR of 5.8

TriMet Elmonica Operations Facility has fewer employees than the Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, c median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 5.4 3.0 11 0 0
2017 11.2 8.6 21 0 0
2016 5.8 4.2 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

485111 · OR · Beaverton

421 Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 240 employers in Beaverton, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 1122 77TH STREET MAINTENANCE 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Community Transit 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1953-2251 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Trans-Bridge Lines, Inc. 7.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hamilton Construction Company 192 FTE
STATE-SIZE Biamp Cascade 192 FTE
STATE-SIZE 9101 - NSM Store Support PDX 192 FTE
STATE-SIZE SWY-0019-0019-01935 FAC-01935-SALEM-OR 192 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nike World Headquarters 14,796 FTE
CITY-NEAR 004-Nike Air Manufacturing Oregon 1,585 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tailwind (IHM - Beaverton) 1,170 FTE
CITY-NEAR Analog Devices 907 FTE
NAT-TCR Brookdale Green Mountain 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Plant 1 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR dd's DISCOUNTS Store 5062 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Supervalu Distribution Center - Fargo 31411 7.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hackleburg 192 FTE
NAT-SIZE Federal Mogul Motorparts - Boaz 192 FTE
NAT-SIZE Carlisle Hib (Pacas) 192 FTE
NAT-SIZE Joliet (Iljol) 192 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.