Transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) · Oregon

TriMet Ruby Junction Operations Facility

Gresham, OR · ~410 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
5.4
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

TriMet Ruby Junction Operations Facility runs at 120% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) workplace, earning a grade C.

TriMet Ruby Junction Operations Facility: 5.4 TCR = 120% of Transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

TriMet Ruby Junction Operations Facility safety composite

TriMet Ruby Junction Operations Facility scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 60% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

DART rate
C 3.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.4

2016→2018

TriMet Ruby Junction Operations Facility injury rate improved

TriMet Ruby Junction Operations Facility's TCR fell 2.4 from 6.5 in 2016 to 4.1 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 6.5 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.58× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.5 · 2017=5.5 · 2018=4.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 485111 · Gresham, OR ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 5.4 · 120% of ind

  • DART 3.1 DART
  • RANK #8/30
  • PHOTO 1953-2231
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 61 inj
  • SIZE ~410 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 1953-2231 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

TriMet Ruby Junction Operations Facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows TriMet Ruby Junction Operations Facility averages 5.4 TCR (120% of the Transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

TriMet Ruby Junction Operations Facility TCR series: 2016=6.5 · 2017=5.5 · 2018=4.1 · BLS 4.5

Where TriMet Ruby Junction Operations Facility falls in its industry

421 Transit systems, mixed mode (e establishments

Safer than 54% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 30 Transit systems, mixed mode (e employers in Oregon.

TriMet Ruby Junction Operations Facility (410 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 217 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate TriMet Ruby Junction Operations Facility
TriMet Ruby Junction Operations Facility (410 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 217 employees and a TCR of 5.8

TriMet Ruby Junction Operations Facility has more employees than the Transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 4.1 3.1 17 0 0
2017 5.5 5.3 19 4 0
2016 6.5 5.5 25 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

485111 · OR · Gresham

421 Transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 98 employers in Gresham, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 1953-2231 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1953-4132 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Joilet, IL - Plainfield Road 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jersey Village, TX - Security 5.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lanz Cabinets 411 FTE
STATE-SIZE Portland 408 FTE
STATE-SIZE ORHI02 408 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harrison Square 408 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6994-PL350 934 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6994-MH 899 FTE
CITY-NEAR 350 874 FTE
CITY-NEAR ON Semiconductor Gresham 839 FTE
NAT-TCR Scranton (Pascr) 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Mooresville Center 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Heritage House 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Blue Bell PA 5.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE RAI Crew CMH 410 FTE
NAT-SIZE San Bernardino (Casbe) 410 FTE
NAT-SIZE Temecula (Caper) 410 FTE
NAT-SIZE Artesia General Hospital 410 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.