Industrial caterers (i.e., providing food services on a contractural arrangement (except single-event basis)) · Louisiana

Trinity Catering Inc.

Houma, LA · ~51 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Trinity Catering Inc. runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Industrial caterers (i.e., providing food services on a contractural arrangement (except single-event basis)) workplace, earning a grade C.

Trinity Catering Inc.: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Industrial caterers (i.e., providing food services on a contractural arrangement (except single-event basis)) BLS 3.0 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Trinity Catering Inc. safety composite

Trinity Catering Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Trinity Catering Inc. held a steady TCR band

Trinity Catering Inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.0 TCR.

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 722310 · Houma, LA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/87
  • PHOTO Barclay's Whippany
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~51 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Barclay's Whippany (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Louisiana employers → · Look up another →

Trinity Catering Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Trinity Catering Inc. averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Industrial caterers (i.e., providing food services on a contractural arrangement (except single-event basis)) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Trinity Catering Inc. TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · BLS 3.0

Where Trinity Catering Inc. falls in its industry

6,952 Industrial caterers (i.e., pro establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Louisiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 87 Industrial caterers (i.e., pro employers in Louisiana.

Trinity Catering Inc. (51 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Trinity Catering Inc.
Trinity Catering Inc. (51 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Trinity Catering Inc. has more employees than the Industrial caterers (i.e., providing foo median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

722310 · LA · Houma

6,952 Industrial caterers (i.e., providing food services on a contractural arrangement (except single-event basis)) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 6,723 rated employers in Louisiana with headcount on file · 173 employers in Houma, LA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Barclay's Whippany 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR MOREHOUSE COLLEGE 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT BLOOMBERG 731 LEX PANTRY 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT GRAMBLING RESIDENT DINING 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Summerhouse Park Provence 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rouses Market #68 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cardinal Health 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kennedy Rice Dryers, LLC 51 FTE
CITY-NEAR Shamrock Energy Solutions 865 FTE
CITY-NEAR Leonard J. Chabert Medical Center 632 FTE
CITY-NEAR Performance Energy Services, LLC 576 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chet Morrison Contractors, LLC 457 FTE
NAT-TCR Portsmouth NNSY Commissary 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR GeoCare, Inc. DBA Home Instead Senior Care 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Columbus Health and Rehab 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR TX-01 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Vehicle Accessory Center, LLC 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE H.J. Brandeles Corporation 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tokai Carbon GE - Hickman Facility 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hyatt Place Miami Airport - EAST 51 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.