Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) · California

Trinity Youth Services - Yucaipa

Yucaipa, CA · ~62 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Trinity Youth Services - Yucaipa runs at 63% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) workplace, earning a grade B.

Trinity Youth Services - Yucaipa: 2.4 TCR = 63% of Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Trinity Youth Services - Yucaipa safety composite

Trinity Youth Services - Yucaipa scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Trinity Youth Services - Yucaipa: 0.0 → 4.8 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 4.8 TCR · DART/TCR 2× in 2018

Trinity Youth Services - Yucaipa's TCR rose 4.8 from 0.0 in 2017 to 4.8 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623990 · Yucaipa, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 63% of ind

  • DART 4.8 DART
  • RANK #15/91
  • PHOTO Boys Town South Flor…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~62 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Boys Town South Florida (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Trinity Youth Services - Yucaipa in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Trinity Youth Services - Yucaipa averages 2.4 TCR (63% of the Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Trinity Youth Services - Yucaipa TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=4.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Trinity Youth Services - Yucaipa falls in its industry

560 Boys' and girls' residential f establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 91 Boys' and girls' residential f employers in California.

Trinity Youth Services - Yucaipa (62 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 6.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Trinity Youth Services - Yucaipa
Trinity Youth Services - Yucaipa (62 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 6.4

Trinity Youth Services - Yucaipa has fewer employees than the Boys' and girls' residential facilities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 4.8 4.8 3 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623990 · CA · Yucaipa

560 Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 22 employers in Yucaipa, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Boys Town South Florida 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6443-558098 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Talladay House 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 582265 705915_BRENHAM OFFICE_ROHD 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Zipper Farms, Inc. 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Crain Marketing, Inc. 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Maricopa Orchards, LLC 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE WESTLAND ORCHIDS 62 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ono-073 908 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sorenson Engineering, Inc. 391 FTE
CITY-NEAR YUCAIPA HILLS POST ACUTE 118 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6962-SWY-0029-0029-01796 98 FTE
NAT-TCR Victor- Branch 14 &15 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR dd's DISCOUNTS Store 5108 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR GH SNF Operations, LLC D/B/A Garnet Hill 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Ricky's 74th Street 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE RBF - Pt. Neches, LLC 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Crown Packaging Corporation - Loudon TN 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE ERCO Interior Systems, INC 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mountain View Landscapes and Lawncare, Inc. 62 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.