Retaining wall, masonry (i.e., block, brick, stone), construction · Ohio

Trisco Systems, Inc

Lima, OH · ~58 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Trisco Systems, Inc runs at 86% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Retaining wall, masonry (i.e., block, brick, stone), construction workplace, earning a grade C.

Trisco Systems, Inc: 2.4 TCR = 86% of Retaining wall, masonry (i.e., block, brick, stone), construction BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Trisco Systems, Inc safety composite

Trisco Systems, Inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Trisco Systems, Inc: 3.7 → 7.3 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 60.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.76× in 2024

Trisco Systems, Inc's TCR rose 3.6 from 3.7 in 2016 to 7.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 60.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.76× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238140 · Lima, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.4 · 86% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #20/45
  • PHOTO Western Specialty Co…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~58 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Western Specialty Contractors - Cleveland (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Trisco Systems, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Trisco Systems, Inc averages 2.4 TCR (86% of the Retaining wall, masonry (i.e., block, brick, stone), construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Trisco Systems, Inc TCR series: 2016=3.7 · 2017=3.9 · 2018=2.1 · 2020=0 · 2021=60.6 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=7.3 · BLS 2.8

Where Trisco Systems, Inc falls in its industry

703 Retaining wall, masonry (i.e., establishments

Safer than 70% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #20 safest of 45 Retaining wall, masonry (i.e., employers in Ohio.

Trisco Systems, Inc (58 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Trisco Systems, Inc
Trisco Systems, Inc (58 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Trisco Systems, Inc has more employees than the Retaining wall, masonry (i.e., block, br median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.3 1.8 4 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 60.6 15.2 4 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.1 2.1 1 0 0
2017 3.9 0.0 2 0 0
2016 3.7 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238140 · OH · Lima

703 Retaining wall, masonry (i.e., block, brick, stone), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 243 employers in Lima, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Western Specialty Contractors - Cleveland 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Phoenix Bay State Construction Co., INc. 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Morris Masonry Restoration LLC 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eatherton Masonry, Inc. 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Spring Meadow Farms 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Aspire Energy 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE K. Hovnanian Companies, LLC - N Ohio 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE DCY 58 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Health St Ritas Medical Center 2,540 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Rita's Medical Center 2,531 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Ritas Medical Center 2,445 FTE
CITY-NEAR LIMA ENGINE 1,457 FTE
NAT-TCR AgBiTech 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Carson Industries, Inc. 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Universal Marketing Systems, Inc. 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Calbrandt, Inc. 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fishers 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Great Plains Gas Compression Holdings, LLC 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE AMS Vans, LLC. 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Grocery Outlet Santa Cruz 58 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.