Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction · Arizona

Tristar Engineering and Management, Inc.

Phoenix, AZ · ~30 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tristar Engineering and Management, Inc. runs at 128% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction workplace, earning a grade D.

Tristar Engineering and Management, Inc.: 3.6 TCR = 128% of Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tristar Engineering and Management, Inc. safety composite

Tristar Engineering and Management, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

38/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Tristar Engineering and Management, Inc. held a steady TCR band

Tristar Engineering and Management, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.2 from 3.7 in 2016 to 3.5 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.7 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0.98× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.7 · 2017=3.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · Phoenix, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 3.6 · 128% of ind

  • DART 3.5 DART
  • RANK #45/63
  • PHOTO SCALAMANDRE CONSTRUC…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SCALAMANDRE CONSTRUCTION (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Tristar Engineering and Management, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tristar Engineering and Management, Inc. averages 3.6 TCR (128% of the Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tristar Engineering and Management, Inc. TCR series: 2016=3.7 · 2017=3.5 · BLS 2.8

Where Tristar Engineering and Management, Inc. falls in its industry

4,078 Pavement, highway, road, stree establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #45 safest of 63 Pavement, highway, road, stree employers in Arizona.

Tristar Engineering and Management, Inc. (30 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Tristar Engineering and Management, Inc.
Tristar Engineering and Management, Inc. (30 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Tristar Engineering and Management, Inc. has fewer employees than the Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 3.5 3.5 1 0 0
2016 3.7 3.7 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · AZ · Phoenix

4,078 Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 2,630 employers in Phoenix, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SCALAMANDRE CONSTRUCTION 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lehigh Valley Division 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR EIA - CAMANCHE 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Northeast Asphalt, Inc. - Fond Du Lac 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE AYC 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southwest Energy Office 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE SAZ-Sierra Vista Office 0047-FAC27 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Apache Junction Sewer District 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maricopa County 15,504 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phoenix Children's Hospital 7,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR All Company 6,261 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030500 6,153 FTE
NAT-TCR KraftHeinz Granite City 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Wixom (Miwix) 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Weeks Marine Equipment Maintenance 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR New Holstein, WI- Plant 2 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rai Mx Dca 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0011 - Stockton, Ca 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0006 - Hesperia, Ca 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0005 - Bakersfield, CA 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.