Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing · Washington

Triumph Composite Systems

Spokane, WA · ~282 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Triumph Composite Systems runs at 130% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Triumph Composite Systems: 4.3 TCR = 130% of Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Triumph Composite Systems safety composite

Triumph Composite Systems scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.7

2018→2020

Triumph Composite Systems injury rate improved

Triumph Composite Systems's TCR fell 1.7 from 5.3 in 2018 to 3.6 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 5.3 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.69× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=5.3 · 2019=4.0 · 2020=3.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336413 · Spokane, WA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.3 · 130% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #36/47
  • PHOTO Radius Aerospace
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 30 inj
  • SIZE ~282 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Radius Aerospace (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Triumph Composite Systems in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Triumph Composite Systems averages 4.3 TCR (130% of the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Triumph Composite Systems TCR series: 2018=5.3 · 2019=4 · 2020=3.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Triumph Composite Systems falls in its industry

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #36 safest of 47 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb employers in Washington.

Triumph Composite Systems (282 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Triumph Composite Systems
Triumph Composite Systems (282 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Triumph Composite Systems has more employees than the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 3.6 3.0 6 0 0
2019 4.0 1.7 12 0 0
2018 5.3 0.9 12 6 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336413 · WA · Spokane

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 551 employers in Spokane, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Radius Aerospace 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sensenich Propeller Service 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR NORDAM Transparency 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR BAUER INC 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Stemilt Ag Services (Ice Harbor) 282 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bob's Heating and Air Conditioning 282 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cascade Dafo, Inc 282 FTE
STATE-SIZE Husky Terminal and Stevedoring, LLC 282 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2252-00000345 6,769 FTE
CITY-NEAR WA642 SACRED HEART MEDICAL CENTER-SPOKANE HR 5,062 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - GEG1 2,476 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Spokane 2,451 FTE
NAT-TCR All-Star-Waterbury 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR ASARCO-Amarillo Copper Refinery 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Arizona Polymer Flooring 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR ABQ Remarketing - 34RK 4.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE MS Farm Bureau Office 282 FTE
NAT-SIZE Meijer #196 282 FTE
NAT-SIZE Park Lane New York 282 FTE
NAT-SIZE Soft-Lite LLC 282 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.