Developing and producing prototypes for aircraft parts (except engines) and auxiliary equipment · Washington

Triumph Integrated Systems - Seattle

Redmond, WA · ~126 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Triumph Integrated Systems - Seattle runs at 32% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Developing and producing prototypes for aircraft parts (except engines) and auxiliary equipment workplace, earning a grade A.

Triumph Integrated Systems - Seattle: 1.1 TCR = 32% of Developing and producing prototypes for aircraft parts (except engines) and auxiliary equipment BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Triumph Integrated Systems - Seattle safety composite

Triumph Integrated Systems - Seattle scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Triumph Integrated Systems - Seattle: 0.0 → 1.4 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 1.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2018

Triumph Integrated Systems - Seattle's TCR rose 1.4 from 0.0 in 2016 to 1.4 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 1.8 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336413 · Redmond, WA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 32% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #15/47
  • PHOTO Crane Aerospace, Lea…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~126 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Crane Aerospace, Lear Romec (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Triumph Integrated Systems - Seattle in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Triumph Integrated Systems - Seattle averages 1.1 TCR (32% of the Developing and producing prototypes for aircraft parts (except engines) and auxiliary equipment BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Triumph Integrated Systems - Seattle TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=1.8 · 2018=1.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Triumph Integrated Systems - Seattle falls in its industry

650 Developing and producing proto establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 47 Developing and producing proto employers in Washington.

Triumph Integrated Systems - Seattle (126 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Triumph Integrated Systems - Seattle
Triumph Integrated Systems - Seattle (126 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Triumph Integrated Systems - Seattle has fewer employees than the Developing and producing prototypes for median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 1.4 0.0 1 0 0
2017 1.8 0.9 2 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336413 · WA · Redmond

650 Developing and producing prototypes for aircraft parts (except engines) and auxiliary equipment employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 216 employers in Redmond, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Crane Aerospace, Lear Romec 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2967-KS92 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Goodrich Corporation (Halthom City TX) 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nacelles And Thrust Reversers 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Chinook Roofing 126 FTE
STATE-SIZE Washington Commercial Painters 126 FTE
STATE-SIZE JEWEL APPLE LLC 126 FTE
STATE-SIZE Phoenix Processor LP - MV Excellence 126 FTE
CITY-NEAR NOA Redmond Campus 1,627 FTE
CITY-NEAR Redmond, WA 1,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR REDMOND (WARED) 1,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR WARED - REDMOND 911 FTE
NAT-TCR RCX Ohio 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Plains Gas Storage 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Kenny Construction Company 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Shopko Store #141 (Burlington, IA) 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wilson Nursing and Rehab 126 FTE
NAT-SIZE City Heights 126 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dean WI - De Pere 126 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ambassador Manor Nursing Center 126 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.