Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing · Washington

Triumph Integrated Systems

Redmond, WA · ~90 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Triumph Integrated Systems runs at 20% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Triumph Integrated Systems: 0.7 TCR = 20% of Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Triumph Integrated Systems safety composite

Triumph Integrated Systems scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Triumph Integrated Systems held a steady TCR band

Triumph Integrated Systems's TCR held near 0.0 from 1.3 in 2021 to 1.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 1.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=1.3 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=1.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336413 · Redmond, WA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 20% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #10/47
  • PHOTO Curtiss-wright Flow …
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~90 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Curtiss-wright Flow CNT SRV LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Triumph Integrated Systems in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Triumph Integrated Systems averages 0.7 TCR (20% of the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Triumph Integrated Systems TCR series: 2021=1.3 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=1.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Triumph Integrated Systems falls in its industry

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 47 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb employers in Washington.

Triumph Integrated Systems (90 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Triumph Integrated Systems
Triumph Integrated Systems (90 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Triumph Integrated Systems has fewer employees than the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.3 1.3 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 1.3 1.3 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336413 · WA · Redmond

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 216 employers in Redmond, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Curtiss-wright Flow CNT SRV LLC 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR HSS Howmet New Brighton 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Midway Aircraft Instrument Corporation 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Goodrich Corporation (Union WV) 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Weber Farms 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE 100852 - SR 520 Floating Bridge and Landings 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE Boone Electric Puyallup 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE MacDonald-Miller Facility Solutions, Inc. Norfolk Shop 90 FTE
CITY-NEAR NOA Redmond Campus 1,627 FTE
CITY-NEAR Redmond, WA 1,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR REDMOND (WARED) 1,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR WARED - REDMOND 911 FTE
NAT-TCR DFW Conveyor Installation LLC 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR NexTech Materials, Ltd 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Tri-State Distributors 71 Royston 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Spartan Chemical Company 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE San Jac Marine, LLC 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jonathan Arnold, Inc. 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE QLS 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE Azteca Foods, Inc. 90 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.