Lids and ends, can, light gauge metal, manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Trivium Packaging USA, Inc. - Bloomsburg

Bloomsburg, PA · ~79 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Trivium Packaging USA, Inc. - Bloomsburg runs at 38% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Lids and ends, can, light gauge metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Trivium Packaging USA, Inc. - Bloomsburg: 1.3 TCR = 38% of Lids and ends, can, light gauge metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Trivium Packaging USA, Inc. - Bloomsburg safety composite

Trivium Packaging USA, Inc. - Bloomsburg scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Trivium Packaging USA, Inc. - Bloomsburg held a steady TCR band

Trivium Packaging USA, Inc. - Bloomsburg's TCR held near 0.3 from 1.4 in 2020 to 1.1 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 1.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.87× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=1.4 · 2023=1.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332431 · Bloomsburg, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 38% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #4/16
  • PHOTO Silgan Containers Me…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~79 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Silgan Containers Menomonee Falls (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Trivium Packaging USA, Inc. - Bloomsburg in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Trivium Packaging USA, Inc. - Bloomsburg averages 1.3 TCR (38% of the Lids and ends, can, light gauge metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Trivium Packaging USA, Inc. - Bloomsburg TCR series: 2020=1.4 · 2023=1.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Trivium Packaging USA, Inc. - Bloomsburg falls in its industry

217 Lids and ends, can, light gaug establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 16 Lids and ends, can, light gaug employers in Pennsylvania.

Trivium Packaging USA, Inc. - Bloomsburg (79 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 117 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Trivium Packaging USA, Inc. - Bloomsburg
Trivium Packaging USA, Inc. - Bloomsburg (79 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 117 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Trivium Packaging USA, Inc. - Bloomsburg has fewer employees than the Lids and ends, can, light gauge metal, m median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2020 1.4 1.4 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332431 · PA · Bloomsburg

217 Lids and ends, can, light gauge metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 57 employers in Bloomsburg, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Silgan Containers Menomonee Falls 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Canpack US LLC Muncie 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ball Beverage Pkg 192 Monticello 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crown Cork & Seal Company LLC - Conroe Plant 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE John C. Leo & Son, LLC 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE C.J. Mushroom Co., LLC 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ernst Conservation Seeds Inc 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Specialty Egg 79 FTE
CITY-NEAR Autoneum Bloomsburg 497 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kawneer Company, Inc. 429 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bloomsburg Plant 411 FTE
CITY-NEAR PCB-Bloomsburg 396 FTE
NAT-TCR CHICAGO, IL (container) 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Saks L'Avenue Restaurant 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR FL Int'l Univ GL Starbucks 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Commercial HVAC Americas : MFG-Columbia, SC-USA 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Otis Elevator Company-Ft. Lauderdale 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE RK-116-Glascow ( RK-116 ) 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE RK-096-Morganton ( RK-096 ) 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Metal Tronics, LLC 79 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.