Lids and ends, can, light gauge metal, manufacturing · New York

Trivium Packaging USA, Inc. - Conklin

Conklin, NY · ~77 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Trivium Packaging USA, Inc. - Conklin runs at 80% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Lids and ends, can, light gauge metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Trivium Packaging USA, Inc. - Conklin: 2.6 TCR = 80% of Lids and ends, can, light gauge metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Trivium Packaging USA, Inc. - Conklin safety composite

Trivium Packaging USA, Inc. - Conklin scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Trivium Packaging USA, Inc. - Conklin: 2.4 → 2.9 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 2.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.54× in 2023

Trivium Packaging USA, Inc. - Conklin's TCR rose 0.5 from 2.4 in 2020 to 2.9 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 0.54× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332431 · Conklin, NY AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.6 · 80% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #4/10
  • PHOTO Silgan Containers Ed…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~77 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Silgan Containers Edison (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Trivium Packaging USA, Inc. - Conklin in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Trivium Packaging USA, Inc. - Conklin averages 2.6 TCR (80% of the Lids and ends, can, light gauge metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Trivium Packaging USA, Inc. - Conklin TCR series: 2020=2.4 · 2023=2.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Trivium Packaging USA, Inc. - Conklin falls in its industry

217 Lids and ends, can, light gaug establishments

Safer than 46% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 10 Lids and ends, can, light gaug employers in New York.

Trivium Packaging USA, Inc. - Conklin (77 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 117 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Trivium Packaging USA, Inc. - Conklin
Trivium Packaging USA, Inc. - Conklin (77 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 117 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Trivium Packaging USA, Inc. - Conklin has fewer employees than the Lids and ends, can, light gauge metal, m median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.9 1.4 2 0 0
2020 2.4 1.2 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332431 · NY · Conklin

217 Lids and ends, can, light gauge metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 21 employers in Conklin, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Silgan Containers Edison 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ball Beverage Pkg 151 Golden 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ball Beverage Pkg 152 Williamsburg 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Independent Can Company-Ft Madison 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Delaney Associates, LP 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lantek Fiber Optic Service, Inc. 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vestal Asphalt Inc. 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE Michels Tunneling -New York 77 FTE
CITY-NEAR Co 01 Maines Paper & Food Service, Inc. 1,112 FTE
CITY-NEAR Conklin DC 264 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - WNY1 171 FTE
CITY-NEAR International Paper Binghamton Container 152 FTE
NAT-TCR USM Store #532 (United) 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR MCRT3 Pueblo Tenant LLC 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Unit #2416 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Unit #2776 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hilldrup Companies, Inc.- Stafford, VA 164-22 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pretium Packaging - Aurora 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE RK-076-Parkersburg ( RK-076 ) 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hen Haven LLC 77 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.