Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g., crop dusting, external fuel tanks, inflight refueling equipment) manufacturing · Ohio

Tronair

Swanton, OH · ~330 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tronair runs at 99% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g., crop dusting, external fuel tanks, inflight refueling equipment) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Tronair: 3.3 TCR = 99% of Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g., crop dusting, external fuel tanks, inflight refueling equipment) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tronair safety composite

Tronair scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2018→2024

Tronair injury rate improved

Tronair's TCR fell 1.1 from 4.5 in 2018 to 3.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 6.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.37× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=4.5 · 2019=6.7 · 2020=2.6 · 2021=1.5 · 2022=1.5 · 2023=2.5 · 2024=3.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336413 · Swanton, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.3 · 99% of ind

  • DART 1.2 DART
  • RANK #33/37
  • PHOTO GKN Aerospace
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 75 inj
  • SIZE ~330 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: GKN Aerospace (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Tronair in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tronair averages 3.3 TCR (99% of the Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g., crop dusting, external fuel tanks, inflight refueling equipment) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tronair TCR series: 2018=4.5 · 2019=6.7 · 2020=2.6 · 2021=1.5 · 2022=1.5 · 2023=2.5 · 2024=3.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Tronair falls in its industry

650 Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g. establishments

Safer than 26% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #33 safest of 37 Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g. employers in Ohio.

Tronair (330 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Tronair
Tronair (330 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Tronair has more employees than the Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g., crop dus median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.4 1.2 14 0 0
2023 2.5 1.4 9 0 0
2022 1.5 1.2 5 0 0
2021 1.5 1.2 5 0 0
2020 2.6 1.0 8 0 0
2019 6.7 6.0 19 0 0
2018 4.5 2.7 15 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336413 · OH · Swanton

650 Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g., crop dusting, external fuel tanks, inflight refueling equipment) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 15 employers in Swanton, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR GKN Aerospace 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR AEC SLC N 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR B&E Manufacturing - Lisi Aerospace 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cadence Aerospace - Anaheim 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Kosei St. Marys Corporation 330 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1478 330 FTE
STATE-SIZE Messer Construction - Cincinnati, OH 329 FTE
STATE-SIZE Zenith Systems 329 FTE
CITY-NEAR Foundation Steel, LLC 170 FTE
CITY-NEAR TOLXL0001 TOLXL0001 160 FTE
CITY-NEAR 016-00504 129 FTE
CITY-NEAR Swanton Health Care & Retirement Center 81 FTE
NAT-TCR Satair USA Inc - Miami 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR John Soules Foods, Tyler 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Interstate Warehousing 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Young Manufacturing Company 3.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE SEA 330 FTE
NAT-SIZE Precision Concrete Construction Inc 330 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wholesale Produce Supply 330 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mcgee Air Services Sfo 330 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.