General combination crop farming (except fruit and nut combinations, oilseed and grain, vegetable) · Washington

Trout Lake Farm East Farm

Ephrata, WA · ~43 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Trout Lake Farm East Farm runs at 43% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General combination crop farming (except fruit and nut combinations, oilseed and grain, vegetable) workplace, earning a grade A.

Trout Lake Farm East Farm: 1.9 TCR = 43% of General combination crop farming (except fruit and nut combinations, oilseed and grain, vegetable) BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Trout Lake Farm East Farm safety composite

Trout Lake Farm East Farm scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.2

2017→2024

Trout Lake Farm East Farm injury rate improved

Trout Lake Farm East Farm's TCR fell 3.2 from 3.2 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 6.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.2 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=6.8 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=3.5 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 111998 · Ephrata, WA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.9 · 43% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/16
  • PHOTO Sandhill Turf
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sandhill Turf (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Trout Lake Farm East Farm in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Trout Lake Farm East Farm averages 1.9 TCR (43% of the General combination crop farming (except fruit and nut combinations, oilseed and grain, vegetable) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Trout Lake Farm East Farm TCR series: 2017=3.2 · 2019=0 · 2020=6.8 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=3.5 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Trout Lake Farm East Farm falls in its industry

128 General combination crop farmi establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 16 General combination crop farmi employers in Washington.

Trout Lake Farm East Farm (43 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Trout Lake Farm East Farm
Trout Lake Farm East Farm (43 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 5.2

Trout Lake Farm East Farm has fewer employees than the General combination crop farming (except median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 3.5 3.5 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 6.8 6.8 3 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 3.2 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

111998 · WA · Ephrata

128 General combination crop farming (except fruit and nut combinations, oilseed and grain, vegetable) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 17 employers in Ephrata, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sandhill Turf 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bidart Bros. et al 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR AgMart Produce NFL 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sandy Knoll Farms, Inc. 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE ML Taggares Inc dba Arete Vineyards 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Andrews Vineyards 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pe Ell 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE PSE, BSC - Bellingham Service Center 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR Grant County PUD#2 - Administration 334 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3260 270 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 3260 264 FTE
CITY-NEAR Administration-Support Personnel 245 FTE
NAT-TCR Greens at Lincolnton LLC 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Accurity Industrial Contractors, llc. 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Newly Weds Foods 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR H - Pennsylvania Hospital NICU 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Chattanooga Station Sweetener Terminal 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fostoria Oilseeds 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Seagraves GP Shelling Plant 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE ViskoTeepak LLC 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.