Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Texas

Truewood by Merrill, Georgetown

Georgetown, TX · ~54 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Truewood by Merrill, Georgetown runs at 331% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Truewood by Merrill, Georgetown: 12.6 TCR = 331% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Truewood by Merrill, Georgetown safety composite

Truewood by Merrill, Georgetown scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Truewood by Merrill, Georgetown: 7.3 → 11.0 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 19.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.88× in 2023

Truewood by Merrill, Georgetown's TCR rose 3.7 from 7.3 in 2021 to 11.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 19.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.88× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Georgetown, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.6 · 331% of ind

  • DART 11.0 DART
  • RANK #403/470
  • PHOTO Auberge at Bee Cave
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~54 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Auberge at Bee Cave (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Truewood by Merrill, Georgetown in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Truewood by Merrill, Georgetown averages 12.6 TCR (331% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Truewood by Merrill, Georgetown TCR series: 2021=7.3 · 2022=19.4 · 2023=11 · BLS 3.8

Where Truewood by Merrill, Georgetown falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #403 safest of 470 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Texas.

Truewood by Merrill, Georgetown (54 employees, TCR 12.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Truewood by Merrill, Georgetown
Truewood by Merrill, Georgetown (54 employees, TCR 12.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Truewood by Merrill, Georgetown has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 11.0 11.0 5 0 0
2022 19.4 9.7 8 0 0
2021 7.3 4.9 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · TX · Georgetown

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 104 employers in Georgetown, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Auberge at Bee Cave 12.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR KRE-BSL HUSKY SALEM OPERATION LLC 12.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 10323 12.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Channel Point Village 12.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Randall County Feedyard 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1681 CORPORATE DR MCKINNEY TX 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE 3525 N HWY 77 WAXAHACHIE TX 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Clearwater Resources LLC 54 FTE
CITY-NEAR Private Residence Georgetown TX 861 FTE
CITY-NEAR Airborn, Inc. (Georgetown) 607 FTE
CITY-NEAR Southwestern University 595 FTE
CITY-NEAR AirBorn, Interconnect 510 FTE
NAT-TCR Fassio Egg Farms - Erda 12.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Minnesota Specialty Yeast, LLC 12.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Mission Point Resort 12.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Naturwood Home Furnishings, Inc. 12.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Machine and Tool Build 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oh - Basf (9565) 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Belleville Wire Cloth 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cherokee Millwright Morristown 54 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.