Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Utah

Truewood by Merrill, Taylorsville

Taylorsville, UT · ~44 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Truewood by Merrill, Taylorsville runs at 163% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Truewood by Merrill, Taylorsville: 6.2 TCR = 163% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Truewood by Merrill, Taylorsville safety composite

Truewood by Merrill, Taylorsville scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 66% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 6.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.6

2021→2023

Truewood by Merrill, Taylorsville injury rate improved

Truewood by Merrill, Taylorsville's TCR fell 6.6 from 8.2 in 2021 to 1.6 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 8.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.15× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=8.2 · 2022=8.8 · 2023=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Taylorsville, UT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.2 · 163% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #17/44
  • PHOTO Villas of HollyBrook…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Villas of HollyBrook Shelbyvil (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Utah employers → · Look up another →

Truewood by Merrill, Taylorsville in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Truewood by Merrill, Taylorsville averages 6.2 TCR (163% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Truewood by Merrill, Taylorsville TCR series: 2021=8.2 · 2022=8.8 · 2023=1.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Truewood by Merrill, Taylorsville falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 58% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Utah alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 44 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Utah.

Truewood by Merrill, Taylorsville (44 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Truewood by Merrill, Taylorsville
Truewood by Merrill, Taylorsville (44 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Truewood by Merrill, Taylorsville has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.6 1.0 5 0 0
2022 8.8 2.9 2 1 0
2021 8.2 2.7 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · UT · Taylorsville

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,861 rated employers in Utah with headcount on file · 20 employers in Taylorsville, UT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Villas of HollyBrook Shelbyvil 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 63141 SUNRISE OF EAST COBB 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 10086 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Sugar Land 6.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Progressive Contracting, Inc. 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Diebold Nixdorf Salt Lake City UT 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Draper CAM 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Challenger Pallet Utah 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR CAP Taylorsville, UT 542 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1686 391 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1686 372 FTE
CITY-NEAR LEGACY VILLAGE OF TAYLORSVILLE 200 FTE
NAT-TCR SugarCreek Packing - Muhlhauser 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Parts Authority Norcross 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #4098 CHINO, CA 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Unit #1977 6.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Residence Inn Washington DC Downtown 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE First Finishers LLC 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Triangle Building Supplies 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE International Paper - Bogalusa 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.