Trusses, wood roof or floor, manufacturing · California

Truspro Structural Components, Inc.

Guadalupe, CA · ~31 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Truspro Structural Components, Inc. runs at 442% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Trusses, wood roof or floor, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Truspro Structural Components, Inc.: 14.6 TCR = 442% of Trusses, wood roof or floor, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Truspro Structural Components, Inc. safety composite

Truspro Structural Components, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

DART rate
F 17.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Truspro Structural Components, Inc.: 8.7 → 17.7 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 21.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.21× in 2021

Truspro Structural Components, Inc.'s TCR rose 9.0 from 8.7 in 2017 to 17.7 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 21.3 TCR. In 2021, DART was 1.21× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321214 · Guadalupe, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 14.6 · 442% of ind

  • DART 17.7 DART
  • RANK #15/20
  • PHOTO Nisbet Brower Compon…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Nisbet Brower Components (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Truspro Structural Components, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Truspro Structural Components, Inc. averages 14.6 TCR (442% of the Trusses, wood roof or floor, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Truspro Structural Components, Inc. TCR series: 2017=8.7 · 2018=21.3 · 2019=15.4 · 2020=9.7 · 2021=17.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Truspro Structural Components, Inc. falls in its industry

421 Trusses, wood roof or floor, m establishments

Safer than 10% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 20 Trusses, wood roof or floor, m employers in California.

Truspro Structural Components, Inc. (31 employees, TCR 14.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 7.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Truspro Structural Components, Inc.
Truspro Structural Components, Inc. (31 employees, TCR 14.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 7.0

Truspro Structural Components, Inc. has fewer employees than the Trusses, wood roof or floor, manufacturi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 17.7 17.7 5 0 0
2020 9.7 9.7 3 0 0
2019 15.4 12.4 5 0 0
2018 21.3 3.0 7 0 0
2017 8.7 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321214 · CA · Guadalupe

421 Trusses, wood roof or floor, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 10 employers in Guadalupe, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Nisbet Brower Components 14.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR K-I Lexington Truss 14.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Trussworthy Components, Inc. 14.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4502 - Valley Truss Plant 14.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE GCF 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nielsen Farms 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Western Star Nurseries LLC 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Progressive Growers Inc 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wish Farms CA - Santa Maria 1,199 FTE
CITY-NEAR BYRD HARVEST INC 277 FTE
CITY-NEAR PanAmerican Seed Guadlupe 67 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ameri-Kleen - Guadalupe Branch 51 FTE
NAT-TCR White Star Machinery- Tulsa 14.6 TCR
NAT-TCR The Pearl at Krusw Way 14.6 TCR
NAT-TCR The Village at Alameda (ALF) 14.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Usmc-E Mh 8th & I 14.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Topline/Hy-Lift Johnson 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Prairie Senior Cottages LLC - Isanti 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of New Britain - DPM 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE M&M Service Company - Carlinville Office 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.