Pharmaceutical manufacturing plant construction · Massachusetts

Truss Engineering Corporation

Indian Orchard, MA · ~54 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.3
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Truss Engineering Corporation runs at 250% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Pharmaceutical manufacturing plant construction workplace, earning a grade F.

Truss Engineering Corporation: 7.3 TCR = 250% of Pharmaceutical manufacturing plant construction BLS 2.9 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Truss Engineering Corporation safety composite

Truss Engineering Corporation scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Truss Engineering Corporation: 7.5 → 8.2 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 11.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.56× in 2024

Truss Engineering Corporation's TCR rose 0.7 from 7.5 in 2017 to 8.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 11.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.56× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236210 · Indian Orchard, MA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.3 · 250% of ind

  • DART 4.1 DART
  • RANK #13/14
  • PHOTO Cind-r-lite North
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~54 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cind-r-lite North (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Truss Engineering Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Truss Engineering Corporation averages 7.3 TCR (250% of the Pharmaceutical manufacturing plant construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Truss Engineering Corporation TCR series: 2017=7.5 · 2018=11.6 · 2023=1.7 · 2024=8.2 · BLS 2.9

Where Truss Engineering Corporation falls in its industry

924 Pharmaceutical manufacturing p establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 14 Pharmaceutical manufacturing p employers in Massachusetts.

Truss Engineering Corporation (54 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Truss Engineering Corporation
Truss Engineering Corporation (54 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Truss Engineering Corporation has fewer employees than the Pharmaceutical manufacturing plant const median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.2 4.1 2 2 0
2023 1.7 1.7 1 0 0
2018 11.6 0.0 6 0 0
2017 7.5 0.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236210 · MA · Indian Orchard

924 Pharmaceutical manufacturing plant construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 6 employers in Indian Orchard, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cind-r-lite North 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Creatacor, Inc. 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR CA032 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Icon Protection Surprise 7.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Eversource - Pittsfield 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE 130 West Street Waltham-MAAG 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Keith Construction Inc. 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE SumCo Eco-Contracting, LLC 54 FTE
CITY-NEAR SPRINGFIELD, MA - 018 83 FTE
CITY-NEAR SPGFLD. NUC. MA - 019 74 FTE
CITY-NEAR DuBois Chemicals dba Heatbath and CAR Products 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR Indian Orchard 19 FTE
NAT-TCR Edgewood Tahoe Resort 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Hilton Charlotte Airport 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR El Monte Sagrado 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR The Estates at Bloomington 7.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Omni Recycling of Babylon Inc 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Share and Care for Special People, Inc 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tech Etch Litchfield 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dixon Construction 54 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.