All Other Specialty Trade Contractors · Texas

TSS at Graphic Packaging Int'l Queen City TX

Queen City, TX · ~28 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

TSS at Graphic Packaging Int'l Queen City TX runs at 57% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical All Other Specialty Trade Contractors workplace, earning a grade B.

TSS at Graphic Packaging Int'l Queen City TX: 1.6 TCR = 57% of All Other Specialty Trade Contractors BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

TSS at Graphic Packaging Int'l Queen City TX safety composite

TSS at Graphic Packaging Int'l Queen City TX scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.9

2019→2023

TSS at Graphic Packaging Int'l Queen City TX injury rate improved

TSS at Graphic Packaging Int'l Queen City TX's TCR fell 2.9 from 2.9 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=2.9 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=3.5 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238990 · Queen City, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.6 · 57% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #139/206
  • PHOTO Yaboo Fence Co Inc
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Yaboo Fence Co Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

TSS at Graphic Packaging Int'l Queen City TX in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows TSS at Graphic Packaging Int'l Queen City TX averages 1.6 TCR (57% of the All Other Specialty Trade Contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

TSS at Graphic Packaging Int'l Queen City TX TCR series: 2019=2.9 · 2021=0 · 2022=3.5 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.8

Where TSS at Graphic Packaging Int'l Queen City TX falls in its industry

1,634 All Other Specialty Trade Cont establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #139 safest of 206 All Other Specialty Trade Cont employers in Texas.

TSS at Graphic Packaging Int'l Queen City TX (28 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate TSS at Graphic Packaging Int'l Queen City TX
TSS at Graphic Packaging Int'l Queen City TX (28 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9

TSS at Graphic Packaging Int'l Queen City TX has fewer employees than the All Other Specialty Trade Contractors median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 3.5 3.5 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.9 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238990 · TX · Queen City

1,634 All Other Specialty Trade Contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 6 employers in Queen City, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Yaboo Fence Co Inc 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4613_18983 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Calvac, Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rabine Paving America 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Village farms of Fort Worth 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Circle X Land & Cattle Co., Ltd. 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Happy Hen Harwood 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ten Hi Gin INC 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR Texarkana TX 822 FTE
CITY-NEAR O&M Texarkana 76 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sonin Beako, LLC 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR Koppers Domino 26 FTE
NAT-TCR 8200 Preston Suite P&Q Jessup MD 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Construction Maintenance 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Belvedere Nursing & Rehab 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Collins Engine Nozzles Inc (Carroll IA) 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Dfa Distributing South - Chatanooga Tn 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fargo Home2 Suites 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE SeaQuest Woodbridge 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tucson Hospice 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.