Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · New Jersey

TTN

East Windsor, NJ · ~87 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.9
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

TTN runs at 138% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade D.

TTN: 8.9 TCR = 138% of Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

TTN safety composite

TTN scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

DART rate
F 18.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

TTN: 2.0 → 18.7 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 18.7 TCR · DART/TCR 2.09× in 2024

TTN's TCR rose 16.7 from 2.0 in 2016 to 18.7 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 2.09× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · East Windsor, NJ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 8.9 · 138% of ind

  • DART 18.7 DART
  • RANK #140/211
  • PHOTO FedEx 100 OLD COUNTY…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 53 inj
  • SIZE ~87 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: FedEx 100 OLD COUNTY CIRCLE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

TTN in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows TTN averages 8.9 TCR (138% of the Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

TTN TCR series: 2016=2 · 2017=3.1 · 2018=4.8 · 2022=15 · 2023=10.1 · 2024=18.7 · BLS 6.5

Where TTN falls in its industry

6,679 Courier services (i.e., interc establishments

Safer than 43% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #140 safest of 211 Courier services (i.e., interc employers in New Jersey.

TTN (87 employees, TCR 8.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate TTN
TTN (87 employees, TCR 8.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

TTN has fewer employees than the Courier services (i.e., intercity networ median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 18.7 18.7 18 0 0
2023 10.1 10.1 10 0 0
2022 15.0 15.0 18 0 0
2018 4.8 4.8 4 0 0
2017 3.1 3.1 2 0 0
2016 2.0 2.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · NJ · East Windsor

6,679 Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 28 employers in East Windsor, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR FedEx 100 OLD COUNTY CIRCLE 8.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR FedEx 95 MACREADY DR 8.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 597140000 8.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR BROWNWOOD (TXBRO) 8.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE 590 - Philadelphia 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE Victoria Fine Foods 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE Frenchtown RTS 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chroma Color Corporation - LAM 87 FTE
CITY-NEAR Shiseido America Inc. 927 FTE
CITY-NEAR Conair East Windsor New Jersey 417 FTE
CITY-NEAR #506 East Windsor Shoprite 272 FTE
CITY-NEAR Conair Corporation - East Windsor, NJ 257 FTE
NAT-TCR Dedicated Logistics, LLC -10 8.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Edelbrock Group, LLC 8.9 TCR
NAT-TCR SupplyHouse Ohio LLC/The Boys Ohio LLC 8.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Bwi-Technical Operations 8.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE RJ Martin National Contracting, Inc. 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ulbrich of Illinois 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE Maintenance & Operations 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hatch Stamping Company - Industrial Dr 87 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.